Evolution - June 1999 by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Tue 01 Jun 1999 - 01:30:15 EDT
Ending: Wed 30 Jun 1999 - 22:07:38 EDT
Messages: 379

• 915603@candseek.com
  • JOBOP Res Assoc Mammalian Cells Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:46:29 -0400 (EDT)
• administrator_at_ucomp@ccmail.llu.edu
  • Message not deliverable Fri, 25 Jun 99 04:04:02 GMT
• Ami Chopine
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:25:45 -0700
  • Re: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:05:55 -0700
  • Re: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:19:45 -0700
• Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Cambrian Explosion Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:45:06 -0700
  • Re: More Proteinoid Information Tue, 01 Jun 1999 17:42:22 -0700
• Bertvan@aol.com
  • "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:59:18 EDT
  • "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:38:44 EDT
  • "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:00:35 EDT
  • science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:59:32 EDT
  • RE:_science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the natural_world Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:32:26 EDT
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:59:43 EDT
  • Immitation of science of immitation of reality Wed, 23 Jun 1999 18:52:53 EDT
  • That razor again. Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:09:17 EDT
  • "Materialism" - was RE: Academic thought police Sun, 20 Jun 1999 15:17:52 EDT
  • Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:24:59 EDT
  • Academic thought police Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:13:57 EDT
  • Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 16:01:24 EDT
  • Academic thought police Sat, 19 Jun 1999 15:45:50 EDT
  • Academic thought police Fri, 18 Jun 1999 16:03:57 EDT
  • Academic thought police Fri, 18 Jun 1999 15:58:17 EDT
  • Acadmic thought police Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:14:20 EDT
  • Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Fri, 18 Jun 1999 10:47:46 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:47:37 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:29:27 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:31:46 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:01:44 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:19:32 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 11:02:15 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:13:37 EDT
  • Laws of nature Sat, 12 Jun 1999 17:36:16 EDT
  • Laws of nature Sat, 12 Jun 1999 09:52:38 EDT
  • Evolution archive list Fri, 11 Jun 1999 10:07:13 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Thu, 10 Jun 1999 22:58:41 EDT
  • Neo Darwinism Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:54:10 EDT
  • Evolution archive list Wed, 9 Jun 1999 18:36:15 EDT
  • evolution archive list Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:31:12 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Mon, 7 Jun 1999 22:55:02 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Mon, 7 Jun 1999 12:23:57 EDT
  • Evolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Mon, 7 Jun 1999 11:28:39 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Sun, 6 Jun 1999 14:18:32 EDT
  • progress in evolution Sun, 6 Jun 1999 12:57:41 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Sun, 6 Jun 1999 10:29:22 EDT
  • Evfolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Sun, 6 Jun 1999 09:44:31 EDT
  • Progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 22:56:17 EDT
  • evolution archive list Fri, 4 Jun 1999 21:39:33 EDT
  • Humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 16:43:58 EDT
  • progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:36:39 EDT
  • progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:56:00 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:33:06 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex Fri, 4 Jun 1999 08:27:42 EDT
  • progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 19:46:17 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:59:51 EDT
  • Are humans irreducibly complex? Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:35:18 EDT
• Biochmborg@aol.com
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Sun, 6 Jun 1999 12:44:41 EDT
  • Re: Evfolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Sun, 6 Jun 1999 10:45:11 EDT
  • Re: progress in evolution Sun, 6 Jun 1999 10:32:40 EDT
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Sun, 6 Jun 1999 01:56:32 EDT
  • Re: Progress in evolution Sun, 6 Jun 1999 01:56:34 EDT
  • Re: Humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 22:15:29 EDT
  • Re: progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 20:58:12 EDT
  • Re: progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:02:47 EDT
  • Re: progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 23:21:38 EDT
  • Re: progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 23:21:36 EDT
  • Re: More Proteinoid Information Wed, 2 Jun 1999 18:14:19 EDT
  • Re: More Proteinoid Information Tue, 1 Jun 1999 14:02:36 EDT
  • Re: General Response Tue, 1 Jun 1999 01:29:30 EDT
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:26:01 -0700
  • Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:34:44 -0700
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:34:40 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:22:06 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:24:44 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:04:32 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:35:02 -0700
  • Re: I'm back! Thu, 10 Jun 1999 18:17:44 -0700
  • Re: Evolution archive list Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:40:12 -0700
  • Re: I'm back! Wed, 09 Jun 1999 17:31:20 -0700
  • Re: evolution archive list Wed, 09 Jun 1999 15:32:09 -0700
  • Re: evolution archive list Tue, 08 Jun 1999 18:13:27 -0700
  • Re: materialism dead? Mon, 07 Jun 1999 14:06:53 -0700
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex Fri, 04 Jun 1999 13:29:55 -0700
  • Re: evolution archive list Fri, 04 Jun 1999 12:01:39 -0700
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:27:50 -0700
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:38:10 -0700
  • Re: science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:03:29 -0700
  • Re: RE:_science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:41:09 -0700
  • Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:42:28 -0700
  • The need for distinguishing tests, etc. Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:26:20 -0700
  • Dead Ends vs. Open Ends Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:43:31 -0700
  • The conditions for life, etc. Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:21:59 -0700
  • Having one's designer and eating him too (yummy!) Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:45:30 -0700
  • Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:32:37 -0700
  • Re: That razor again. Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:50:54 -0700
  • Getting a shave with Occam's Razor Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:47:17 -0700
  • Re: Piano tipping Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:38:11 -0700
  • That Razor again. Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:27:12 -0700
  • Occam's Razor Cuts Deeply, and rejecting science Sun, 20 Jun 1999 22:53:49 -0700
  • Types of ID theory, testing, putting mind where mouth is, etc. Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:14:33 -0700
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Fri, 18 Jun 1999 23:43:15 -0700
  • Re: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Fri, 18 Jun 1999 22:37:40 -0700
  • Re: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:31:11 -0700
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:56:15 -0700
  • Choice and design and Occam's razor, etc. Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:16:32 -0700
  • On Believing Things Because they are Printed in Books Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:42:41 -0700
  • Re: Divine Feet are not only in the door, they're in the woods, too. Mon, 14 Jun 1999 13:37:00 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 13:09:06 -0700
  • Divine Feet are not only in the door, they're in the woods, too. Mon, 14 Jun 1999 12:31:25 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 11:46:31 -0700
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Sun, 13 Jun 1999 20:19:45 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Sat, 12 Jun 1999 23:33:30 -0700
  • Re: Laws of nature Sat, 12 Jun 1999 23:27:58 -0700
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 12 Jun 1999 10:55:47 -0700
  • Re: Laws of nature Sat, 12 Jun 1999 09:40:34 -0700
  • Laws of nature Fri, 11 Jun 1999 22:59:25 -0700
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Fri, 11 Jun 1999 02:15:29 -0700
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 11 Jun 1999 02:05:47 -0700
  • Re: Evolution archive list Fri, 11 Jun 1999 01:36:38 -0700
  • Re: Geometry as Physics, foundations of mathematics Fri, 11 Jun 1999 01:30:15 -0700
  • Re: Evolution archive list Wed, 9 Jun 1999 19:49:57 -0700
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Mon, 7 Jun 1999 10:52:59 -0700
  • Re: Geometry as Physics, and the foundations of mathematics Mon, 7 Jun 1999 00:41:00 -0700
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Sun, 6 Jun 1999 21:49:47 -0700
  • Re: progress in evolution Sun, 6 Jun 1999 08:44:55 -0700
  • A Note on Validation as a Broader Concept than that of Proof. Sun, 6 Jun 1999 07:28:26 -0700
  • Re: progress in evolution Sat, 5 Jun 1999 12:00:48 -0700
  • Design vs. Occam's Razor, Geometry as Physics, and the foundations of mathematics Sat, 5 Jun 1999 11:46:03 -0700
  • Re: Progress in evolution Sat, 29 May 1999 06:00:06 -0700
  • Evolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Sat, 29 May 1999 04:26:21 -0700
  • The "direction" of evolution, etc. Fri, 28 May 1999 05:16:32 -0700
• Cliff Lundberg
  • Re: Cambrian Explosion Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:46:37 -0700
  • Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Thu, 24 Jun 1999 01:40:00 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:14:19 -0700
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 11:31:16 -0700
  • Re: progress in evolution Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:08:02 -0700
  • Re: progress in evolution Thu, 03 Jun 1999 23:52:04 -0700
• David J. Tyler
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:29:33 GMT
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:04:17 GMT
  • RE: Are apologists irreducibly dense? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:45:11 GMT
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:18:19 GMT
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Wed, 23 Jun 1999 13:20:46 GMT
  • Two Complementary faces of establishment science Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:27:00 GMT
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:20:46 GMT
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:42:04 GMT
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:57:51 GMT
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:21:55 GMT
  • Re: humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 17:17:23 GMT
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:13:12 GMT
  • Re: Origin of the Phyla Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:22:55 GMT
  • Re: humans irreducibly complex? Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:54:42 GMT
  • Re: Origin of the Phyla Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:54:52 GMT
  • Re: humans irreducibly complex? Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:56:14 GMT
• Donald Frack
  • RE: Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:08:46 -0700
• Earthlink
  • Re: A Note on Validation as a Broader Concept than that of Proof. Sun, 6 Jun 1999 22:09:18 -0500
• evolution-digest
  • evolution-digest V1 #1511 28 Jun 1999 09:40:02 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1510 28 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1509 28 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1508 27 Jun 1999 09:40:02 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1507 27 Jun 1999 09:40:02 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1506 27 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1505 26 Jun 1999 09:40:02 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1504 26 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1503 26 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1502 25 Jun 1999 09:40:02 -0000
  • evolution-digest V1 #1501 25 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0000
• Gary Collins
  • Computer Scientist To Explore Intricacies Of Biological Evolution Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:20:45 +0100 (BST)
• Glenn Morton
  • Fwd: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:00:10 -0500
  • Re: Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:56:58 -0500
  • Re: Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Tue, 22 Jun 1999 20:59:16 -0500
  • Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Tue, 22 Jun 1999 19:44:48 -0500
  • Re: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Mon, 21 Jun 1999 21:05:38 -0500
  • RE: Are apologists irreducibly dense? Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:27:18 -0500
  • Re: Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
• Glenn R. Morton
  • More data on the Neanderthal hybrid Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:09:46 -0500
  • Neanderthal hybrid Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:09:04 -0500
  • CRSQ engages in historical revisionism Sun, 20 Jun 1999 08:52:43 -0500
  • Re: Fish to Amphibian Fri, 18 Jun 1999 21:46:36 -0500
  • Re: Fish to Amphibian Fri, 18 Jun 1999 21:33:16 -0500
  • Re: Academic thought police Fri, 18 Jun 1999 16:34:14 -0500
  • Re: Acadmic thought police Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:22:10 -0500
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly densie? Thu, 17 Jun 1999 15:42:17 -0500
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:27:44 -0500
  • Re: Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:55:00 -0500
• Howard J. Van Till
  • Re: ID: 'episodic creationist' and 'based on the artisan Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:40:37 -0400
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:54:10 -0400
  • Definitions needed Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:17:29 -0400
• Huxter4441@aol.com
  • Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:47:17 EDT
  • Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:43:49 EDT
  • Re: progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:59:57 EDT
• Jason Bode
  • Re: "scientific" position on philosophical questions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:16:01 PDT
  • Re: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:01:28 PDT
  • sorry Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:30:29 PDT
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:45:10 PDT
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:44:49 PDT
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:23:41 PDT
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:44:08 PDT
  • Re: cutting throats ;) {was: getting a shave} with Occam's Razor Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:51:33 PDT
  • Re: Occam's Razor Cuts Deeply Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:18:09 PDT
  • Re: Piano tipping Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:06:38 PDT
  • Re: Choice and design and Occam's razor, etc. Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:22:57 PDT
  • Re: Moses and Biblical contradictions? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:48:37 PDT
  • Re: On Believing Things Because they are Printed in Books Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:27:19 PDT
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:34:07 PDT
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:52:20 PDT
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 12:28:46 PDT
  • Re: Geometry as Physics, foundations of mathematics Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:37:18 PDT
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Mon, 07 Jun 1999 08:36:43 PDT
  • Re: Geometry as Physics, and the foundations of mathematics Sun, 06 Jun 1999 21:25:16 PDT
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Sat, 05 Jun 1999 20:59:33 PDT
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 04 Jun 1999 15:29:21 PDT
  • Re: Tolerance Tue, 01 Jun 1999 13:00:20 PDT
• Joel Duff
  • Morris on ID Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:05:08 -0500
• John E. Rylander
  • RE: ID: `episodic creationist' and `based on the artisan metaphor'? (was ID MN - limitation...) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:13:21 -0500
  • RE: ID: `episodic creationist' and `based on the artisan metaphor'? (was ID MN - limitation...) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:09:20 -0500
• Jonathan Clarke
  • Academic thought police (was Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense?) Fri, 18 Jun 1999 09:22:00 +1000
• Loren Haarsma
  • Re: Origin of the Phyla Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:12:52 -0400 (EDT)
• Marcio Pie
  • Re: What a star! Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:58:26 -0400 (EDT)
• Mark Phillips
  • Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:08:05 +0930
• MccarrickAD@nswccd.navy.mil
  • Strange hybrids Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:23:43 -0400
• Mike L Anderson
  • Re: CRSQ engages in historical revisionism Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:29:03 +0000
• Pim van Meurs
  • RE: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:48:57 -0700
  • RE: science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:54:43 -0700
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:39:44 -0700
  • RE: It all fits... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:24:58 -0700
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:22:41 -0700
  • =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_=5Fscience=5Fcan=5Fstudy=5Fthe=5Feffect=5F?= Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:19:17 -0700
  • =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intell?= Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:49:29 -0700
  • RE: Immitation of science of immitation of reality Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:24:49 -0700
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:22:45 -0700
  • RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:16:15 -0700
  • RE: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:14:38 -0700
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:45:22 -0700
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:06:14 -0700
  • RE: Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:03:07 -0700
  • RE: Design as a Research Program (was clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists...) Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:03:03 -0700
  • RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:47:13 -0700
  • RE: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Tue, 22 Jun 1999 19:21:19 -0700
  • RE: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:08:35 -0700
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:45:29 -0700
  • RE: [breakpoint] The Puzzle of Life, 6/16/99 Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:32:23 -0700
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:30:27 -0700
  • RE: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:25:24 -0700
  • RE: That razor again. Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:55:44 -0700
  • RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Sun, 20 Jun 1999 16:36:06 -0700
  • RE: the clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists put aside the design argument Sun, 20 Jun 1999 16:27:33 -0700
  • RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sun, 20 Jun 1999 12:09:39 -0700
  • RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:13:01 -0700
  • RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:58:39 -0700
  • RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:54:26 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:53:51 -0700
  • RE: Academic thought police Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:50:56 -0700
  • RE: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:40:34 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:35:48 -0700
  • RE: Academic thought police Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:32:06 -0700
  • RE: Academic thought police Sat, 19 Jun 1999 10:25:15 -0700
  • RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Fri, 18 Jun 1999 09:04:30 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:55:03 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:51:29 -0700
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:55:16 -0700
  • RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:10:10 -0700
  • RE: Cause and effect in evolution Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:07:15 -0700
  • RE: The Case for Intelligent Design Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:01:55 -0700
  • RE: Neo Darwinism Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:56:22 -0700
  • RE: Neo Darwinism Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:02:08 -0700
  • RE: Neo Darwinism Sun, 13 Jun 1999 12:19:17 -0700
  • RE: Neo Darwinism Sat, 12 Jun 1999 15:26:18 -0700
  • RE: Evolution archive list Fri, 11 Jun 1999 09:12:37 -0700
  • RE: Evolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:12:03 -0700
  • RE: Are humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 09:07:10 -0700
  • RE: progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 09:02:19 -0700
  • RE: progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 19:35:21 -0700
• Rich Daniel
  • materialism dead? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 17:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 21:05:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: age of the earth Thu, 3 Jun 1999 11:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 11:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
• Stephen Jones
  • Re: Neanderthal hybrid Thu, 01 Jul 1999 06:02:01 +0800
  • Re: What a star! Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:20:16 +0800
  • Re: ID: 'episodic creationist' and 'based on the artisan metaphor'? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 06:18:13 +0800
  • RE: ID: `episodic creationist' and `based on the artisan metaphor'? (was ID MN - limitation...) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:41:39 +0800
  • Re: Definition of `design', `intelligent design' (was Definitions needed) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:33:41 +0800
  • Re: biology has belatedly realised that it is, itself, an information technology Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:56:47 +0800
  • Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Human hybrid 2/2 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:18:24 +0800
  • Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Human hybrid 1/2 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:18:04 +0800
  • Re: ID: `episodic creationist' and `based on the artisan metaphor'? (was ID MN - limitation...) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:59:40 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 06:23:15 +0800
  • Re: It all fits... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:59:56 +0800
  • Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:22:31 +0800
  • Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 06:06:30 +0800
  • Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Thu, 24 Jun 1999 05:46:03 +0800
  • Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:17:57 +0800
  • Re: Design as a Research Program (was clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists...) Wed, 23 Jun 1999 06:30:23 +0800
  • Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Wed, 23 Jun 1999 06:25:04 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:11:29 +0800
  • Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Human hybrid Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:30:19 +0800
  • Fwd: [breakpoint] The Puzzle of Life, 6/16/99 Tue, 22 Jun 1999 06:08:52 +0800
  • Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:28:24 +0800
  • RE: the clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists put aside the design argument Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:35:50 +0800
  • Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Sun, 20 Jun 1999 19:22:49 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 23:12:32 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 23:02:03 +0800
  • Re: I'm back! Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:54:47 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:33:40 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Thu, 17 Jun 1999 23:12:44 +0800
  • Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Thu, 17 Jun 1999 21:18:09 +0800
  • Re: Cause and effect in evolution Wed, 16 Jun 1999 06:08:35 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 06:03:13 +0800
  • Re: The Case for Intelligent Design Mon, 14 Jun 1999 06:36:45 +0800
  • Re: I'm back! Mon, 14 Jun 1999 06:27:43 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Mon, 14 Jun 1999 06:11:01 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Sat, 12 Jun 1999 20:18:29 +0800
  • Re: I'm back! Fri, 11 Jun 1999 05:52:43 +0800
  • Re: Mice Study Shows Genes Are Not Always Destiny Fri, 11 Jun 1999 05:36:53 +0800
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:02:58 +0800
  • Re: I'm back! Wed, 09 Jun 1999 05:01:34 +0800
• Steve Clark
  • FYI Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:21:40 -0500
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:18:32 -0500
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:42:58 -0500
  • Re: Academic thought police Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:39:04 -0500
  • Re: General Response Tue, 01 Jun 1999 17:03:57 -0500
• Susan B
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:38:53 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:28:31 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:09:51 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:30:54 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:19:30 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on Mon, 21 Jun 1999 21:07:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:53:31 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Mon, 21 Jun 1999 18:27:06 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:43:42 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:40:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:28:36 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Divine Feet Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:49:21 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Sat, 5 Jun 1999 17:25:46 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 20:39:29 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: progress in evolution Thu, 3 Jun 1999 19:32:45 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: tolerance Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:38:29 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Behe/Newton, bombardier beetle Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:35:22 -0500 (CDT)
• Susan Brassfield
  • Re: Cambrian Explosion Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:27:48 -0600
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:18:24 -0600
  • Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:55:35 -0600
  • RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:41:22 -0600
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:40:39 -0600
  • RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:38:16 -0600
  • Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:45:21 -0600
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:11:02 -0600
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:31:04 -0600
  • Re: Having one's designer and eating him too (yummy!) Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:19:23 -0600
  • Re: Academic thought police Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:31:31 -0600
  • Re: I'm back! Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:20:58 -0600
  • Re: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:45:46 -0600
  • Re: Academic thought police Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:36:39 -0600
  • Re: Acadmic thought police Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:02:08 -0600
  • Re: Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:38:30 -0600
  • Re: The Case for Intelligent Design Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:56:13 -0600
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:41:25 -0600
  • Re: On Believing Things Because they are Printed in Books Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:27:59 -0600
  • Re: I'm back! Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:34:51 -0600
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:14:41 -0600
  • Re: Neo Darwinism Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:09:56 -0600
  • Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:55:24 -0600
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:35:21 -0600
  • Re: Evolution archive list Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:02:45 -0600
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Fri, 4 Jun 1999 16:39:47 -0600
  • Re: progress in evolution Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:34:21 -0600
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Thu, 3 Jun 1999 14:28:17 -0600
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Thu, 3 Jun 1999 12:06:25 -0600
  • Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Wed, 2 Jun 1999 16:20:05 -0600
  • Re: Tolerance Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:40:17 -0600
• SZYGMUNT@EXODUS.VALPO.EDU
  • Re: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:28:33 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: The conditions for life, etc. Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:45:49 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:26:48 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:10:41 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Divine Feet are not only in the door, they're in the woods, too. Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:02:39 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Divine Feet are not only in the door, they're in the woods, too. Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:43:45 -0500 (CDT)
• Tim Ikeda
  • "Materialism" - was RE: Academic thought police Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:32:41 -0400
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:29:20 -0400
  • RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Mon, 07 Jun 1999 22:24:59 -0400
  • Evolvability Wed, 02 Jun 1999 21:57:36 -0400
  • Re: humans irreducibly complex? Wed, 02 Jun 1999 21:45:19 -0400
• Tom Pearson
  • Re: humans irreducibly complex? Wed, 02 Jun 1999 10:03:16 -0500

Last message date: Wed 30 Jun 1999 - 22:07:38 EDT
Archived on: Wed Jun 30 1999 - 22:07:42 EDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives