Steven, you're once again wrong. ID people are not interested in new research programs. Why should they? All they have to do is say ID and no further inquiry is required. Flagella ? IC and ID, therefor no more investiation is needed. It's obvious from the "Wedge" that all that they are interested in is sneaking God into science. Not a pretty sight indeed.
All that ID is interested in is finding a method to support their faith. Dembski's design interference was an attempt which failed. Behe's IC was an attempt which failed.
SJ: 1. Detectability Problem --- How is design detected?
How is apparant design detected from real design?
Dembski and Behe tried and failed. Why do you believe that there will be a scientific ID ?
ID has nothing to contribute to science. .