evolution@calvin.edu by thread
Starting: Mon 01 Jan 1996 - 14:08:01 EST
Ending: Wed 14 Feb 1996 - 09:52:08 EST
Messages: 409
- Critique of Biotic Message Terry M. Gray
- Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Stephen Jones
- Bumblebees can't fly Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Stephen Jones
- Provine and Pascal Thomas L Moore
- Will Provine and Howard Temin Steve Clark
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Brian D. Harper
- Re: Will Provine Gordon Simons
- Will Provine Gordon Simons
- Eldredge/Johnson tapes Terry M. Gray
- Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Stephen Jones
- God's "Randomness" (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- God's "Randomness" (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- Dean Kenyon's Address Steven Fawl
- RE: Philosophy of Science Stephen Jones
- New England conference lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
- Re: Dean Kenyon Steven Schimmrich
- Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Test--ignore this message Terry M. Gray
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Stephen Jones
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention David J. Tyler
- RE: Philosophy of Science Bill Hamilton
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
- Philosophy of Science Norm Smith
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Brian D. Harper
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- John Leslie? Brian D. Harper
- John Leslie? Brian D. Harper
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Brian D. Harper
- Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention David J. Tyler
- Johnson-Eldredge debate Ross Pavlac
- Re: Dawkins' Bridge Deal (was Pamphlet Part V) Stephen Jones
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Bill Hamilton
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Bill Hamilton
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
- ID John W.
- Ken Ham John W.
- Re: Dawkins' Bridge Deal (was Pamphlet Part V) Derek McLarnen
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
- Re: Paradigm blindness lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: Paradigm blindness lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Bill Hamilton
- Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
- _Reinventing Darwin_ (Book Review) Bill Hamilton
- design-for-self-assembly and intervention lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Bill Hamilton
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Stephen Jones
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwin's deity (was Philosophy of Science) Stephen Jones
- Re: Old Earth Tract-Suggestions John W. Burgeson
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Bill Hamilton
- Re: Darwin's deity (was Philosophy of Science) Bill Hamilton
- Complexity Definitions Brian D. Harper
- Interesting article in Science Bill Hamilton
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... David J. Tyler
- Re: Darwin's deity (was Philosophy of Science) Stephen Jones
- Algorithmic Complexity [2/2] Brian D. Harper
- Algorithmic Complexity [2/2] Brian D. Harper
- Algorithmic Complexity [2/2] Brian D. Harper
- Algorithmic Complexity [1/2] Brian D. Harper
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Bill Hamilton
- Re: Paradigm blindness David J. Tyler
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... David J. Tyler
- Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
- Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
- Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
- Quibble re terminology (was re: Philosophy of Science) Bill Hamilton
- Index Fossils Norm Smith
- 135 million year old bacteria Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic when scientists slight Stephen Jones
- Rules and index fossils Russell T. Arndts
- Rock Strata & the Bible Record John W. Burgeson
- Re: TE or PC? Bill Hamilton
- Majordomo results--so how do i get off this list?? Nancy Biggins
- Re: TE or PC? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- "Paradigm blindness" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- question on algorithmic complexity Bill Hamilton
- Greeting to Group Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- Chance and the Hand of God Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
- Philosophy of Science/ID David J. Tyler
- Re: index fossils Norm Smith
- Why an engineer goes ballistic when scientists slight design Bill Hamilton
- Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA Bill Hamilton
- Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA Steve Clark
- Re: index fossils Andrew MacRae
- Pamphlet Project vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fi Russell T. Arndts
- Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fi DRATZSCH@legacy.calvin.edu
- Re: Back Issues of Reflector (was Philosophy of science/ID Stephen Jones
- Re: Back Issues of Reflector (was Philosophy of science/ID Stephen Jones
- Philosophy of science/ID David J. Tyler
- Index fossils and logic Russell T. Arndts
- Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
- The subject should "questionable logic." Russell T. Arndts
- Gish's questionable statements Bill Hamilton
- Re: Philosophy of Science / I.D. Jim Bell
- Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fi Stephen Jones
- Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
- Re: Philosophy of Science / I.D. lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Complexity John W. Burgeson
- Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA John W. Burgeson
- Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA HOWARDLION@aol.com
- Re: Dawkins' Deception? (was Pamphlet Part V) Stephen Jones
- Re: Hominid FAQ & OEC (was pamphlet Part III) Stephen Jones
- Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
- Re: Speciation (was Fwd: New Phylum found) Stephen Jones
- Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
- There should be whole books about it. Russell T. Arndts
- Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
- Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fit the paradigm? Russell T. Arndts
- Science as a game: unfortunate choice of words? John W. Burgeson
- Yes, lets find the written rules. Russell T. Arndts
- age of reflectorites etc Nancy Biggins
- Age distribution of reflectorites Gordon Simons
- Rules Russell T. Arndts
- Science as a game: unfortunate choice of words? Bill Hamilton
- Re: TE or PC? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: PC/TE definitions... lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: PC/TE #1 (was PC/TE definitions, misperceptions...) Stephen Jones
- Re: Goodbye Stephen Jones
- Re: The Game of Science (was Human explosion (fwd)) Stephen Jones
- Re: The Game of Science (was Human explosion (fwd)) Stephen Jones
- Re: Faith First? Bill Hamilton
- Re: Faith First? Brian D. Harper
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Jim Bell
- Re: Faith First? Jim Bell
- Re: Goodbye, Glenn Bill Hamilton
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
- Inefficient Design Argument John W. Burgeson
- Re: Goodbye, Glenn Jim Bell
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Jim Bell
- Re: An Apology For Stephen Jones Stephen Jones
- Re: pamphlet Part III Stephen Jones
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
- Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
- Re: Dawkins speaks for Science? (was How should Christians Stephen Jones
- Re: Gn 1:1 an "executive summary"? (was Drawing Glenn....) Stephen Jones
- Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Brian D. Harper
- Evil Ross Pavlac
- Stonekings Eve II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Pamphlet Part V (fwd) vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Stoneking's Eve Jim Foley
- Glenn Morton vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Broca's Area Jim Foley
- Fwd: New Phylum found Bill Hamilton
- Re: Goodbye GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Pamphlet Part V Derek McLarnen
- Pamphlet Part III iteration II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part V iteration II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Stoneking's Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- endocasts and Broca's area GRMorton@aol.com
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Stoneking's Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- New phylum GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: More Mortonian Eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
- Tough love GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: More Mortonian Eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Jim Bell
- Re: "evolution" antithetical? Stephen Jones
- Re: PC/TE #1 (was PC/TE definitions, misperceptions...) Stephen Jones
- Re: ICR Home Page Stephen Jones
- Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
- Re: How should Christians handle refutations? (long) Stephen Jones
- Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
- Re: Books and Tapes by Professor Phillip E. Johnson Stephen Jones
- Re: PC/TE #2 (was PC/TE definitions, misperceptions...) Stephen Jones
- Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
- Re: More Mortonian Eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: "formless" GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: pamphlet Part III Stephen Jones
- Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
- Re: pamphlet part IV Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
- Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
- Re: An Apology For Stephen Jones Stephen Jones
- Lunch hour philosophy on the Bible Bill Hamilton
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate II Brian D. Harper
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Bill Hamilton
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Jim Bell
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate II GRMorton@aol.com
- New Phylum found GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate II Brian D. Harper
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
- Books GRMorton@aol.com
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Apology to Glenn Morton vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: 1st Query and truth Steve Clark
- Re: 1st Query and truth Jim Bell
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Jim Bell
- Re: Broca's Area Jim Foley
- Re: 1st Query and truth Bill Hamilton
- Re: 1st Query and truth Steve Clark
- Re: Last Word ;-) lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: 1st Query and truth Jim Bell
- Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Bill Hamilton
- Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: 1st Query and truth Steve Clark
- Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
- Re: Coincidences (was free will/determinism and God's plan Stephen Jones
- Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Stephen Jones
- Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Stephen Jones
- Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Stephen Jones
- Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Stephen Jones
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Stephen Jones
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Stephen Jones
- Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
- Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
- Re: Design, evolution and imperfection arguments Stephen Jones
- Re: Genetic Similarity Stephen Jones
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Re: Pamphlet Part II response 3 Stephen Jones
- Re: Where is the List Archive? Stephen Jones
- Truth? Jim Bell
- 1st Query (fwd) Gordon Simons
- Re: pamphlet Part III Jim Foley
- Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam (Private) Jim Foley
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
- Questions about endocasts of fossil hominid brains Bill Hamilton
- Re: Last Word ;-) GRMorton@aol.com
- Stoneking's Eve Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Broca's Area (Update) vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part V, response I vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Stoneking's Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- historicity and "character issues" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: "evolution" antithetical? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- PC/TE definitions, misperceptions, strengths, weaknesses lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Re: pamphlet part IV DRATZSCH@legacy.calvin.edu
- Re: A Confession of Sin ;-) Bill Hamilton
- Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Brian D. Harper
- Re: pamphlet Part III Brian D. Harper
- Re: Broca's Area and Mitochondrial Eve GRMorton@aol.com
- Science or Poetry? GRMorton@aol.com
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Archives for evolution@calvin.edu Terry M. Gray
Last message date: Wed 14 Feb 1996 - 09:52:08 EST
Archived on: Wed Feb 14 1996 - 09:54:30 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.