Evolution - April 2000
By Date

Starting: Sat Apr 01 2000 - 07:45:53 EST
Ending: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 17:55:49 EDT

• Re: Scientists Say Universe Is Flat But Growing Stephen E. Jones (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:51:28 EDT)
• Re: Anti-evolutionists use of quotes Huxter4441@aol.com (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 12:03:57 EDT)
• Re: Intelligent Design Stephen E. Jones (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:01:52 EDT)
• Anti-evolutionists use of quotes Troy Britain (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 05:15:11 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Brian D Harper (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 00:53:41 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Stephen E. Jones (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 20:04:07 EDT)
• Re: Scientists Say Universe Is Flat But Growing Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 12:36:56 EDT)
• Re: Free Will and Morality and Origins and God Chris Cogan (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 11:24:06 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Richard Wein (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 04:08:06 EDT)
• Re: Scientists Say Universe Is Flat But Growing Cliff Lundberg (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 02:00:44 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 22:26:07 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 22:50:27 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Chris Cogan (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 22:51:24 EDT)
• Re: Scientists Say Universe Is Flat But Growing Stephen E. Jones (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 19:17:07 EDT)
• Abiogenesis and a website Susan Brassfield (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 17:48:38 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Brian D Harper (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 19:13:30 EDT)
• Gene duplication and design Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 15:19:07 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Susan Brassfield (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 15:13:48 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 12:48:50 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Stephen E. Jones (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 10:11:39 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 09:51:02 EDT)
• Re: Morality (was Gene duplication and design) Richard Wein (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 06:19:02 EDT)
• Re: Intelligent Design billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 00:02:39 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design billwald@juno.com (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 20:37:49 EDT)
• RE: Intelligent Design Hofmann, Jim (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 21:25:40 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Tedd Hadley (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 18:59:29 EDT)
• Intelligent Design Susan Brassfield (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 17:53:25 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Susan Brassfield (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 17:40:08 EDT)
• Re: Morality (was Gene duplication and design) Tedd Hadley (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 17:25:54 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 08:15:39 EDT)
• ON SALE THIS WEEK: 3COM PALM VX CONNECTED ORGANIZER PALMPILOT FOR ONLY $410.95 newsletter@accessmicro.com (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 08:18:47 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 06:53:13 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Chris Cogan (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 21:00:42 EDT)
• Morality (was Gene duplication and design) Richard Wein (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 20:43:52 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Stephen E. Jones (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 18:43:05 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Tedd Hadley (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 17:24:02 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Cliff Lundberg (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 14:47:22 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Tedd Hadley (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 14:54:46 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Steve Clark (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 14:33:33 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Howard J. Van Till (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 12:59:31 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Susan Brassfield (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 10:46:12 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector Richard Wein (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 09:18:46 EDT)
• Re: ad hominems & the future of this Reflector (was Why lie? was: Re: the role of sex in evolution) Stephen E. Jones (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 22:03:56 EDT)
• Message from Mike Howard J. Van Till (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 19:51:19 EDT)
• Re: Images Show Warm Side of Dinosaur Hearts Stephen E. Jones (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 19:33:13 EDT)
• Re: Definitions Chris Cogan (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 18:27:23 EDT)
• Re:Falsification of Darwinism (was: the role of sex in evolution) Chris Cogan (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 18:03:42 EDT)
• Why lie? was: Re: the role of sex in evolution Susan Brassfield (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 12:52:45 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Richard Wein (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 09:25:39 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? William N. Garrison (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 19:52:38 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Howard J. Van Till (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 17:46:54 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Howard J. Van Till (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 17:45:54 EDT)
• Re: Ruling out God intervening at strategic points in natural history? (was tests and predictions) billwald@juno.com (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 00:39:15 EDT)
• Re: Ruling out God intervening at strategic points in natural history? (was tests and predictions) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 19:31:50 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 19:29:30 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Steve Clark (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 16:53:23 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 15:41:40 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Howard J. Van Till (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 14:51:22 EDT)
• Interesting essay for bertvan: Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 13:57:22 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 13:45:12 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Howard J. Van Till (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 09:06:22 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Richard Wein (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 21:14:02 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 17:51:29 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 17:40:10 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 17:38:02 EDT)
• Re: In one of those multiple universes... MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 17:29:01 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Howard J. Van Till (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 13:33:07 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Steve Clark (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 11:08:07 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Richard Wein (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 03:51:26 EDT)
• Re: Ruling out God intervening at strategic points in natural history? (was tests and predictions) billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 17:05:52 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 14:33:30 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 14:25:08 EDT)
• Re: In one of those multiple universes... Steve Clark (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 16:55:42 EDT)
• In one of those multiple universes... MikeBGene@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 16:08:38 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 15:15:01 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Huxter4441@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 14:10:09 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Cliff Lundberg (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 13:40:55 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Cliff Lundberg (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 13:28:46 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Huxter4441@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 13:35:34 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 13:17:49 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Steve Clark (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 12:06:16 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Susan Brassfield (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 10:49:28 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Huxter4441@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 06:46:16 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Cliff Lundberg (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 03:05:35 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Cliff Lundberg (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 02:32:41 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Richard Wein (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 03:58:32 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? MikeBGene@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 02:25:24 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 01:58:51 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure MikeBGene@aol.com (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 00:57:35 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Tedd Hadley (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 20:33:19 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 20:29:53 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 18:54:32 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Ami Chopine (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 19:24:50 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Brian D Harper (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 21:28:41 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 17:36:03 EDT)
• Re: Ruling out God intervening at strategic points in natural history? (was tests and predictions) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 17:37:34 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Tedd Hadley (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 16:33:39 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Cliff Lundberg (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 14:55:12 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 13:08:17 EDT)
• Re: Novel paradigms? Susan Brassfield (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 13:02:22 EDT)
• Novel paradigms? Wesley R. Elsberry (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 13:39:04 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Steve Clark (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 12:15:26 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 09:59:54 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 01:44:51 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Apr 19 2000 - 01:17:03 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Richard Wein (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 19:07:38 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Susan B (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 18:56:30 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Steve Clark (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 16:13:21 EDT)
• Gene duplication and design Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 15:44:21 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure MikeBGene@aol.com (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 10:21:51 EDT)
• Re: Law professor unleashes fury on macro-evolution, etc. Stephen E. Jones (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 07:52:41 EDT)
• Re: When peer review is really peer pressure Richard Wein (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 06:52:04 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's qu... Brian D Harper (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 01:31:47 EDT)
• When peer review is really peer pressure MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 22:08:48 EDT)
• Re: randomness Howard J. Van Till (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 19:28:25 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Tedd Hadley (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:54:34 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:50:23 EDT)
• Re: randomness Terry M. Gray (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:48:35 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:45:50 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:39:38 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions billwald@juno.com (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:22:41 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Tedd Hadley (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:07:21 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Tedd Hadley (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 14:27:39 EDT)
• Announcement - IHCMD Online Summer School Axel Dorscht (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 13:06:20 EDT)
• Re: randomness Howard J. Van Till (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 09:14:51 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Richard Wein (Sun Apr 16 2000 - 10:39:41 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions billwald@juno.com (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 23:09:44 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution billwald@juno.com (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 22:03:22 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 11:31:18 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 06:24:41 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions billwald@juno.com (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 03:28:07 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design Tedd Hadley (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 18:11:15 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Stephen E. Jones (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 17:35:17 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 19:51:52 EDT)
• Re: Dating Old Rocks Allen & Diane Roy (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 13:14:08 EDT)
• Re: tests and predictions Susan Brassfield (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 12:58:26 EDT)
• Re; The role of sex in evolution billwald@juno.com (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 00:01:14 EDT)
• tests and predictions billwald@juno.com (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 16:28:13 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Tedd Hadley (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 12:56:02 EDT)
• Re: Celera Finishes Sequence of a Person's Genes, etc Stephen E. Jones (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 10:03:22 EDT)
• randomness billwald@juno.com (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 16:25:18 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 19:30:20 EDT)
• Fwd: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 11:14:09 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Susan Brassfield (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 10:49:18 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 18:10:39 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Stephen E. Jones (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 17:59:45 EDT)
• Re: Jerry Coyne on A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coe... MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 20:41:31 EDT)
• Re: really big question Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 20:40:53 EDT)
• Re: My policy on private creation/evolution debates (was Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 20:32:42 EDT)
• really big question Cliff Lundberg (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 19:47:11 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Cliff Lundberg (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 15:51:09 EDT)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1A Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 10:32:46 EDT)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1B Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 10:16:51 EDT)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1 Richard Wein (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 10:15:40 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 06:12:45 EDT)
• Re: New Species Fills Evolutionary Gap, etc Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 04:14:11 EDT)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1 David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 23:59:21 EDT)
• A Review of Kent Hovind's thesis Susan Brassfield (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 15:10:05 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Tedd Hadley (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 13:01:15 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Susan Brassfield (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 12:49:32 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Cliff Lundberg (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 02:08:01 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Stephen E. Jones (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 18:06:11 EDT)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1 Stephen E. Jones (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 09:14:59 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Richard Wein (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 07:29:40 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] MikeBGene@aol.com (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 01:55:26 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Terry M. Gray (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 19:37:12 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Stephen E. Jones (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 18:10:41 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Tedd Hadley (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 16:51:46 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Susan Brassfield (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 12:33:57 EDT)
• Re: Jerry Coyne on A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion Richard Wein (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 08:35:53 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 01:43:51 EDT)
• Re: Yahoo! News Story - New Species Fills Evolutionary Gap David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 00:11:51 EDT)
• Re: the role of sex in evolution Bill Payne (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 12:47:08 EDT)
• Re: the AIDS thing Susan B (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 22:59:18 EDT)
• Yahoo! News Story - New Species Fills Evolutionary Gap Yahoo! News (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 22:36:18 EDT)
• Jennifer Lopez's Nude Home Video's 100% Free abe52@email.com (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 18:58:05 EDT)
• Re: the AIDS thing Stephen E. Jones (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 18:22:06 EDT)
• the AIDS thing Susan Brassfield (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 15:22:59 EDT)
• Jerry Coyne on A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion John E. Rylander (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 07:41:16 EDT)
• the role of sex in evolution gareth diamond (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 06:24:03 EDT)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1 David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 01:29:28 EDT)
• Fw: Re: Jewish View Of Creationism Bill Payne (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 22:19:27 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Tedd Hadley (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 18:04:44 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Terry M. Gray (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 18:02:53 EDT)
• Re: Neanderthal DNA shows strong differences from modern humans, etc Stephen E. Jones (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 07:02:44 EDT)
• Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's question MikeBGene@aol.com (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 22:57:02 EDT)
• Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's question Brian D Harper (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 01:01:10 EDT)
• Re: Gene duplication and design [ was Re: Dennett's bad word ...] Stephen E. Jones (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 01:36:32 EST)
• Re: Jewish View Of Creationism Emm Foster (Fri Mar 31 2000 - 10:02:48 EST)
• Re: Ah, it's 2d law time again (1/2) #1 Stephen E. Jones (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 18:50:50 EST)
• Re: Jewish View Of Creationism Bill Payne (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 07:41:30 EST)

Last message date: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 17:55:49 EDT
Archived on: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 17:55:51 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 17:55:51 EDT