Reflectorites
On Fri, 07 Apr 2000 11:49:32 -0500, Susan Brassfield wrote:
[...]
>SJ>All
>>one has to do is point to a `verse' in the evolutionist's `Bible', the
>>Talk.Origins website, and all will be well!
SB>creationists of all kinds *hate* the talk.origins website :-)
[...]
Well, I don't. And I have never heard of any creationist say (publicly
or privately" that he/she"hates" *any* evolutionist website.
[...]
SB>This: "`verse' in the
>evolutionist's `Bible', the Talk.Origins website" is ad hominem of the
>first water.
[...]
An "ad hominem" against a *website*???
Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nor, fourthly, would any man in his senses think the existence of the
watch, with its various machinery, accounted for, by being told that it was
one out of possible combinations of material forms; that whatever he had
found in the place where he found the watch, must have contained some
internal configuration or other; and that this configuration might be the
structure now exhibited, viz. of the works of a watch, as well as a different
structure." (Paley W., "Natural Theology: or, Evidences of the Existence
and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature,"
[1802], St. Thomas Press: Houston, TX, 1972, reprint, p.4)
Stephen E. Jones | sejones@iinet.net.au | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 08 2000 - 06:12:06 EDT