Evolution - July 2000
By Date

Starting: Sun Jul 02 2000 - 13:05:22 EDT
Ending: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:35 EDT

• Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:01:32 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse Cliff Lundberg (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 21:31:18 EDT)
• Nightline Wesley R. Elsberry (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 18:54:05 EDT)
• Re: Nightline last night Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 17:37:26 EDT)
• Re: FOLLOW $ to PHILLIP JOHNSON Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 08:12:36 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 05:00:05 EDT)
• Re: major logical flaw Richard Wein (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 15:32:26 EDT)
• major logical flaw Cliff Lundberg (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 13:31:51 EDT)
• Van Till's chapter Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 11:45:23 EDT)
• Re: Nightline transcript URL Richard Wein (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 11:34:38 EDT)
• Re: FOLLOW $ to PHILLIP JOHNSON Steven P Crawford (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 10:42:56 EDT)
• Nightline transcript URL Wesley R. Elsberry (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 10:36:26 EDT)
• FOLLOW $ to PHILLIP JOHNSON Susan Brassfield (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 09:33:03 EDT)
• Re: Van Till's chapter Richard Wein (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 08:05:39 EDT)
• Re: Van Till's chapter Richard Wein (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 04:14:45 EDT)
• Johnson on Nightline and the spectre of McCarthy Wesley R. Elsberry (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 02:06:56 EDT)
• Re: Nightline last night Chris Cogan (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 01:03:22 EDT)
• Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) Chris Cogan (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 00:47:38 EDT)
• Re: Van Till's chapter Steven P Crawford (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 17:20:10 EDT)
• Re: Van Till's chapter Brian D Harper (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 14:55:13 EDT)
• Nightline last night Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 12:20:29 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse Chris Cogan (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 01:58:38 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 18:47:13 EDT)
• Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) Richard Wein (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 16:48:57 EDT)
• Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) Richard Wein (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:06 EDT)
• Re: Defining terms Brian D Harper (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 16:03:23 EDT)
• Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) Chris Cogan (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 12:49:26 EDT)
• RE: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) John E. Rylander (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 09:42:54 EDT)
• RE: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) John E. Rylander (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 09:37:19 EDT)
• Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) Richard Wein (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 09:10:55 EDT)
• Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) Chris Cogan (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 01:08:51 EDT)
• Re: Kansas and ID Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 08:49:05 EDT)
• Re: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 17:29:00 EDT)
• Re: Van Till's chapter Steven P Crawford (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 11:16:05 EDT)
• Re: Van Till's chapter Richard Wein (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 04:09:58 EDT)
• Re: More snippets from Johnson's new book Susan Brassfield (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 19:35:49 EDT)
• Re: More snippets from Johnson's new book Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 09:28:39 EDT)
• FW: Embarrassing God John E. Rylander (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 16:09:19 EDT)
• Christianity and Intelligent Design theory John E. Rylander (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 14:48:10 EDT)
• Van Till's chapter Steven P Crawford (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 13:31:53 EDT)
• Re: What's Wrong With the Fine-Tuning Argument? Richard Wein (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 10:04:31 EDT)
• What's Wrong With the Fine-Tuning Argument? Chris Cogan (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 00:29:01 EDT)
• Re: Kansas and ID Susan Brassfield (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 20:19:35 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Richard Wein (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 19:10:19 EDT)
• Re: Kansas and ID Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 10:50:06 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 16:29:41 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Richard Wein (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 16:02:27 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:25:05 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:20:35 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Richard Wein (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:14:27 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Richard Wein (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 14:54:06 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 10:53:09 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 05:08:43 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson billwald@juno.com (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 00:18:58 EDT)
• semi-ID? billwald@juno.com (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 23:54:03 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Richard Wein (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 22:05:50 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 18:12:45 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 17:51:56 EDT)
• Re: Star Physics Prove the Delicacy of Life Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 17:41:45 EDT)
• Re: Defining terms David Bradbury (Sat Jul 22 2000 - 17:04:41 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 17:35:24 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:24:45 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Huxter4441@aol.com (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:07:33 EDT)
• Re: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:01:49 EDT)
• Re: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism billwald@juno.com (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 23:51:38 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson Steven P Crawford (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 23:59:02 EDT)
• Re: [creationevolve] Re: [2debate] Evolution contributes to Susan Brassfield (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 19:44:46 EDT)
• Re: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 17:29:46 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 16:54:17 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson Steve Clark (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 11:31:30 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson Howard J. Van Till (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 09:34:28 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson Richard Wein (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 04:22:02 EDT)
• Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson billwald@juno.com (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 00:11:13 EDT)
• Lamoureaux & Johnson Steven P Crawford (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 23:17:54 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution billwald@juno.com (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 20:57:35 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 14:20:59 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Steve Clark (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 10:24:52 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 18:22:14 EDT)
• Re: Politics in America sometimes avoids fundamental issues, but not in Kansas Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 16:59:04 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 13:03:36 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:58:28 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! Steve Clark (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:50:27 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Tedd Hadley (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:47:51 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:43:52 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! billwald@juno.com (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:38:56 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Chris Cogan (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 11:57:18 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! Steve Clark (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 11:06:07 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution billwald@juno.com (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 20:12:35 EDT)
• Re: ID opens up a new front billwald@juno.com (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 20:25:17 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Chris Cogan (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 18:31:25 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 18:26:57 EDT)
• Re: ID opens up a new front Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 16:57:09 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 17:00:54 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Tedd Hadley (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 13:46:05 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Chris Cogan (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 13:16:10 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 11:32:29 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 11:26:18 EDT)
• Re: "atheist morality" and ID in the courts Stephen E. Jones (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 19:14:47 EDT)
• Re: On Questions About the Origins, if any, of the Universe .... #2 Stephen E. Jones (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 19:14:26 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Tedd Hadley (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 15:47:59 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Tedd Hadley (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 15:34:21 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 12:51:05 EDT)
• Defining terms Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 12:42:00 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? Richard Wein (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 05:53:38 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Chris Cogan (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 00:09:10 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Tom Pearson (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 22:59:49 EDT)
• Re: Defining terms Brian D Harper (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 20:11:08 EDT)
• Defining terms David Bradbury (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 15:02:19 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! billwald@juno.com (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 14:24:03 EDT)
• Re: Origin of Life Up in the Air -- Literally Cliff Lundberg (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 03:29:04 EDT)
• Re: Origin of Life Up in the Air -- Literally Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 09:36:27 EDT)
• Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 08:49:49 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 16:10:35 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Susan Brassfield (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 12:58:12 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 11:22:15 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Susan Brassfield (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 10:44:38 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Jul 12 2000 - 16:55:01 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Chris Cogan (Wed Jul 12 2000 - 09:41:44 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Brian D Harper (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 20:48:27 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 12:22:16 EDT)
• Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution Richard Wein (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 05:43:38 EDT)
• Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 Cliff Lundberg (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 04:03:28 EDT)
• Randomness and complex organization via evolution Chris Cogan (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 02:18:20 EDT)
• Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jul 10 2000 - 17:42:31 EDT)
• Re: atheist morality" and ID in the courts billwald@juno.com (Mon Jul 10 2000 - 14:13:37 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? Tedd Hadley (Mon Jul 10 2000 - 13:23:09 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 11:10:04 EDT)
• Re: On Questions About the Origins, if any, of the Universe .... #1 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 10:19:17 EDT)
• Re: Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove Chris Cogan (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 17:47:20 EDT)
• Further reflections on "ultimate premises," the Principle of Naturalistic Sufficiency, and non-naturalism's much-bewailed burden of proof for its own claims. Chris Cogan (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 16:23:07 EDT)
• Re: Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 13:39:15 EDT)
• Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove-my-o Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 16:17:17 EDT)
• Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove-my-outrageous-claims" blues. Chris Cogan (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 13:02:14 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Chris Cogan (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 12:34:41 EDT)
• RE: atheist morality" and ID in the courts Susan Brassfield (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 11:27:53 EDT)
• "atheist morality" and ID in the courts Susan Brassfield (Fri Jul 07 2000 - 11:09:27 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Chris Cogan (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 19:19:54 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 18:21:43 EDT)
• Re: Modern Darwinism: better engines through natural selection, etc Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 10:54:02 EDT)
• Re: Info. on writing theories Cliff Lundberg (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 14:23:18 EDT)
• Re: Various (evidence and logic, etc) Cliff Lundberg (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 03:59:52 EDT)
• (no subject) Steve Clark (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 14:24:50 EDT)
• Re: Info. on writing theories Richard Wein (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 03:10:04 EDT)
• Re: Various (evidence and logic, etc) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jul 05 2000 - 17:36:19 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Tedd Hadley (Wed Jul 05 2000 - 17:18:45 EDT)
• Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 Cliff Lundberg (Tue Jul 04 2000 - 22:29:54 EDT)
• Re: Two alternatives to theistic design theory, etc. Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jul 04 2000 - 18:04:37 EDT)
• Re: Empirical evidence for evolution? Chris Cogan (Tue Jul 04 2000 - 00:00:30 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) billwald@juno.com (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 22:55:21 EDT)
• Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 18:20:24 EDT)
• Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 17:30:25 EDT)
• Re: Info. on writing theories Cliff Lundberg (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 15:05:41 EDT)
• Re: Empirical evidence for evolution? Susan Brassfield (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 12:52:18 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Chris Cogan (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 09:53:13 EDT)
• Re: Info. on writing theories Richard Wein (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 06:17:15 EDT)
• On Questions About the Origins, if any, of the Universe, the Nature and Origin of Life, and the "Meaning" of Life Chris Cogan (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 00:57:49 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism billwald@juno.com (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 23:49:34 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Terry Trainor (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:50:31 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Chris Cogan (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:39:48 EDT)
• Re: Empirical evidence for evolution? David Bradbury (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:30:56 EDT)
• Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Richard Wein (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:07:47 EDT)
• Re: Two alternatives to theistic design theory, etc. Richard Wein (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 20:17:42 EDT)
• The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism Chris Cogan (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 19:27:10 EDT)
• Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 17:50:17 EDT)
• Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 09:39:15 EDT)
• Re: Two alternatives to theistic design theory, etc. Stephen E. Jones (Sat Jul 01 2000 - 19:02:17 EDT)
• The demise of the vapor canopy glenn morton (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 07:27:46 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:35 EDT
Archived on: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:37 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:37 EDT