Evolution - July 2000
By Author

Starting: Sun Jul 02 2000 - 13:05:22 EDT
Ending: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:35 EDT

• Bertvan@aol.com
  • Van Till's chapter (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 11:45:23 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 14:20:59 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 18:26:57 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 17:00:54 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 11:32:29 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 11:26:18 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 12:51:05 EDT)
  • Defining terms (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 12:42:00 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 16:10:35 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 11:22:15 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Wed Jul 12 2000 - 16:55:01 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 12:22:16 EDT)
  • Re: Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 13:39:15 EDT)
  • Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove-my-o (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 16:17:17 EDT)
• billwald@juno.com
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 00:18:58 EDT)
  • semi-ID? (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 23:54:03 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 23:51:38 EDT)
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 00:11:13 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 20:57:35 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:38:56 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 20:12:35 EDT)
  • Re: ID opens up a new front (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 20:25:17 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 14:24:03 EDT)
  • Re: atheist morality" and ID in the courts (Mon Jul 10 2000 - 14:13:37 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 22:55:21 EDT)
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 23:49:34 EDT)
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: Van Till's chapter (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 14:55:13 EDT)
  • Re: Defining terms (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 16:03:23 EDT)
  • Re: Defining terms (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 20:11:08 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 20:48:27 EDT)
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: Nightline last night (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 01:03:22 EDT)
  • Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 00:47:38 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 01:58:38 EDT)
  • Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 12:49:26 EDT)
  • Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 01:08:51 EDT)
  • What's Wrong With the Fine-Tuning Argument? (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 00:29:01 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 11:57:18 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 18:31:25 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 13:16:10 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 00:09:10 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Wed Jul 12 2000 - 09:41:44 EDT)
  • Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 02:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 17:47:20 EDT)
  • Further reflections on "ultimate premises," the Principle of Naturalistic Sufficiency, and non-naturalism's much-bewailed burden of proof for its own claims. (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 16:23:07 EDT)
  • Jones and his "Gimme-that-old-level-playing-field-so-I-won't- have-to-prove-my-outrageous-claims" blues. (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 13:02:14 EDT)
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 12:34:41 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 19:19:54 EDT)
  • Re: Empirical evidence for evolution? (Tue Jul 04 2000 - 00:00:30 EDT)
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 09:53:13 EDT)
  • On Questions About the Origins, if any, of the Universe, the Nature and Origin of Life, and the "Meaning" of Life (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 00:57:49 EDT)
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:39:48 EDT)
  • The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 19:27:10 EDT)
• Cliff Lundberg
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 21:31:18 EDT)
  • major logical flaw (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 13:31:51 EDT)
  • Re: Origin of Life Up in the Air -- Literally (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 03:29:04 EDT)
  • Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 04:03:28 EDT)
  • Re: Info. on writing theories (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 14:23:18 EDT)
  • Re: Various (evidence and logic, etc) (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 03:59:52 EDT)
  • Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 (Tue Jul 04 2000 - 22:29:54 EDT)
  • Re: Info. on writing theories (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 15:05:41 EDT)
• David Bradbury
  • Re: Defining terms (Sat Jul 22 2000 - 17:04:41 EDT)
  • Defining terms (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 15:02:19 EDT)
  • Re: Empirical evidence for evolution? (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:30:56 EDT)
• glenn morton
  • The demise of the vapor canopy (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 07:27:46 EDT)
• Howard J. Van Till
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 09:34:28 EDT)
• Huxter4441@aol.com
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 05:08:43 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 17:35:24 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:07:33 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 18:22:14 EDT)
• John E. Rylander
  • RE: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 09:42:54 EDT)
  • RE: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 09:37:19 EDT)
  • FW: Embarrassing God (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 16:09:19 EDT)
  • Christianity and Intelligent Design theory (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 14:48:10 EDT)
• Richard Wein
  • Re: major logical flaw (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 15:32:26 EDT)
  • Re: Nightline transcript URL (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 11:34:38 EDT)
  • Re: Van Till's chapter (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 08:05:39 EDT)
  • Re: Van Till's chapter (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 04:14:45 EDT)
  • Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 16:48:57 EDT)
  • Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:06 EDT)
  • Re: Is Darwinism Self-Refuting? (was: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer) (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 09:10:55 EDT)
  • Re: Van Till's chapter (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 04:09:58 EDT)
  • Re: What's Wrong With the Fine-Tuning Argument? (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 10:04:31 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 19:10:19 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 16:02:27 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:14:27 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 14:54:06 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 22:05:50 EDT)
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 04:22:02 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 05:53:38 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Tue Jul 11 2000 - 05:43:38 EDT)
  • Re: Info. on writing theories (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 03:10:04 EDT)
  • Re: Info. on writing theories (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 06:17:15 EDT)
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:07:47 EDT)
  • Re: Two alternatives to theistic design theory, etc. (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 20:17:42 EDT)
• Stephen E. Jones
  • Re: Nightline last night (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 17:37:26 EDT)
  • Re: FOLLOW $ to PHILLIP JOHNSON (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 08:12:36 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 05:00:05 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 18:47:13 EDT)
  • Re: Kansas and ID (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 08:49:05 EDT)
  • Re: An intelligent discussion with Intelligent Design's designer (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 17:29:00 EDT)
  • Re: More snippets from Johnson's new book (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 09:28:39 EDT)
  • Re: Kansas and ID (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 10:50:06 EDT)
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 17:51:56 EDT)
  • Re: Star Physics Prove the Delicacy of Life (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 17:41:45 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 17:29:46 EDT)
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 16:54:17 EDT)
  • Re: Politics in America sometimes avoids fundamental issues, but not in Kansas (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 16:59:04 EDT)
  • Re: ID opens up a new front (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 16:57:09 EDT)
  • Re: "atheist morality" and ID in the courts (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 19:14:47 EDT)
  • Re: On Questions About the Origins, if any, of the Universe .... #2 (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 19:14:26 EDT)
  • Re: Origin of Life Up in the Air -- Literally (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 09:36:27 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 08:49:49 EDT)
  • Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 (Mon Jul 10 2000 - 17:42:31 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 11:10:04 EDT)
  • Re: On Questions About the Origins, if any, of the Universe .... #1 (Sun Jul 09 2000 - 10:19:17 EDT)
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 18:21:43 EDT)
  • Re: Modern Darwinism: better engines through natural selection, etc (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 10:54:02 EDT)
  • Re: Various (evidence and logic, etc) (Wed Jul 05 2000 - 17:36:19 EDT)
  • Re: Two alternatives to theistic design theory, etc. (Tue Jul 04 2000 - 18:04:37 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 18:20:24 EDT)
  • Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 2/2 (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 17:30:25 EDT)
  • Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2 (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 17:50:17 EDT)
  • Re: macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2 (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 09:39:15 EDT)
  • Re: Two alternatives to theistic design theory, etc. (Sat Jul 01 2000 - 19:02:17 EDT)
• Steve Clark
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 16:29:41 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:25:05 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:20:35 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 10:53:09 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Sun Jul 23 2000 - 18:12:45 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:24:45 EDT)
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 11:31:30 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of... (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 10:24:52 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:50:27 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 11:06:07 EDT)
  • (no subject) (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 14:24:50 EDT)
• Steven P Crawford
  • Designed Designers? (Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:01:32 EDT)
  • Re: FOLLOW $ to PHILLIP JOHNSON (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 10:42:56 EDT)
  • Re: Van Till's chapter (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 17:20:10 EDT)
  • Re: Van Till's chapter (Wed Jul 26 2000 - 11:16:05 EDT)
  • Van Till's chapter (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 13:31:53 EDT)
  • Re: Lamoureaux & Johnson (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 23:59:02 EDT)
  • Lamoureaux & Johnson (Tue Jul 18 2000 - 23:17:54 EDT)
• Susan Brassfield
  • FOLLOW $ to PHILLIP JOHNSON (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 09:33:03 EDT)
  • Re: More snippets from Johnson's new book (Tue Jul 25 2000 - 19:35:49 EDT)
  • Re: Kansas and ID (Mon Jul 24 2000 - 20:19:35 EDT)
  • Re: [creationevolve] Re: [2debate] Evolution contributes to (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 19:44:46 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 12:58:12 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 10:44:38 EDT)
  • RE: atheist morality" and ID in the courts (Sat Jul 08 2000 - 11:27:53 EDT)
  • "atheist morality" and ID in the courts (Fri Jul 07 2000 - 11:09:27 EDT)
  • Re: Empirical evidence for evolution? (Mon Jul 03 2000 - 12:52:18 EDT)
• Susan Brassfield Cogan
  • Re: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:01:49 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 13:03:36 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:58:28 EDT)
  • Re: 1. Mike Behe's letter to SCIENCE, 2. Provine & Gish's letters, 3. Less of my posts! (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:43:52 EDT)
• Tedd Hadley
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 12:47:51 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sun Jul 16 2000 - 13:46:05 EDT)
  • Re: Randomness and complex organization via evolution (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 15:47:59 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Sat Jul 15 2000 - 15:34:21 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (Mon Jul 10 2000 - 13:23:09 EDT)
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Wed Jul 05 2000 - 17:18:45 EDT)
• Terry Trainor
  • Re: The Question of Starting Point Premises, and the Burden of Proof for Non-Naturalism (Sun Jul 02 2000 - 21:50:31 EDT)
• Tom Pearson
  • Re: on atheistic principles? (was macroevolution or macromutations? (was ID) 1/2) (Fri Jul 14 2000 - 22:59:49 EDT)
• Wesley R. Elsberry
  • Nightline (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 18:54:05 EDT)
  • Nightline transcript URL (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 10:36:26 EDT)
  • Johnson on Nightline and the spectre of McCarthy (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 02:06:56 EDT)
  • Nightline last night (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 12:20:29 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:35 EDT
Archived on: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:38 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 11:11:38 EDT