In a message dated 7/17/00 11:06:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
ssclark@facstaff.wisc.edu writes:
<< > > but rather it is because he argues that "intelligent design in biology
>.... is empirically detectable":
>
>Why, then, doesn't he suggest a method? He only talks in generalities.
He does suggest a method. Mike says that ID is detectable by irreducible
complexity. >>
But since IC is little more than an assumption based on the ignorance of the
history of the system in question, that is no evidence at all. One should
wonder why nothing tangible is in evidence....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 17 2000 - 18:22:29 EDT