Science-and-Religion for Understanding and Faith
This page describes two related educational goals,
to help students learn about:
1) relationships (theological, philosophical, historical, sociological,
psychological,...) between science and religion, where the goal (as
in
all education) is improved understanding that is wider, deeper,
and more accurate;
2) mutual interactions between a person's faith
and their views of science/religion relationships, where the goal (which
is important in
Christian education) is improved
faith and quality of Christian living.
The American Scientific Affiliation is a fellowship of scientists — and scholars in a variety of fields who find science interesting and sometimes think about it — who are Christians. Because all of us are scientists (or scholars who study science) and Christians, one of our main shared interests is the complex system of relationships between science and theology, between our views of nature (studied in science) and our views of God, humans, and life (studied in theology).
How can science affect
faith?
This question can be important for a Christian's
own personal faith, and also for
serving others with friendship, peer
support, mentoring,
counseling,
or pastoral care.
For
the most important aspects of a worldview, there is evidence but not proof,
so each
person — no matter what their beliefs are — must live by
faith in the personal worldview they have constructed and accepted. The
life-goal of Christians is to live by faith in Christ, to make decisions,
continually throughout each day, on the
basis of trust in God's character and promises.
If our faith is affected by anything, including our views
of science-and-Christianity, it will
affect the way we live. If a Christian thinks
there is conflict between the claims of science and the Bible-based principles
of Christianity,
this perceived conflict can be a challenge to personal faith
and the quality of Christian living. We'll look at three challenges
that can occur — in Appropriate Humility about Creation, Science
and Divine Action, Christian Counseling — but we'll begin with the
first question, about how to improve our understanding.
1. Accurate Understanding
Although you'll find ideas about science-and-religion
relationships throughout this website, because our goal is Whole-Person Education
for Science and Faith, a good starting place is Searching
for Truth in the Two Books of God: interpreting Scripture & Nature in our
Theology & Science which explains why the unfortunately common
portrayal of "science and religion in conflict" is distorted and
oversimplistic (so it is rejected by modern
historians), and examines Mutually Interactive Relationships
between Science & Religion and How to Wisely Use
Information from The Two Books, and asks "Can historical science
produce reliable
conclusions?" and
"Are disagreements between Christians due to differences in competence
and character?"
You can look at Stories
of Science in current events and during history (as in
questions about Columbus and a flat earth, Galileo and a moving earth, geologists
and an old earth, Darwin and evolution,
and more)
and Debates about Science (what
it is and what it means, how we should do it and view it) involving historians,
sociologists, psychologists, theologians, philosophers, and scientists.
The area for Worldviews includes Apologetics,
Proof, and Postmodernism & Worldview
Education and Christian Living & Stewardship
of Life in a Christian Worldview.
Science
and Faith is written by Jack Haas (another web-editor for ASA), and his
other Topics
Pages also include science-and-faith as a central theme.
These ideas may be useful for you, as a teacher (who
can pass on what you're learning) and also for your students — so they
can gain more understanding and, building on this foundation, increase
their own
faith and their ability to help others (as a friend, counselor,...)
in ways that are spiritually edifying.
2. Three Potential Challenges
to Faith
These are potential challenges to faith
(due to perceptions of science)
but —
if there is a solid understanding of theology and science, and an attitude of
humility
— they should not be actual challenges.
Appropriate Humility about the details
of Creation
Consider a potential IF-IF-THEN
dilemma: IF
a
person
believes
that "if
the
Bible is true, the earth is young" (or
"if the Bible is true,
evolution
did not occur") and IF they look at scientific evidence-and-logic and
conclude, either consciously or unconsciously,
that
probably the earth is old (or some evolution did occur), THEN — because
the first IF is logically
equivalent to believing that
"if the earth is not young (or if some evolution did occur *),
the Bible is not true" — the logical conclusion is that "probably
the Bible is not true," and faith can be
weakened or abandoned.
* a
claim
that "evolution did occur" is often confusing due to the
wide range of potential definitions for evolution, which
can mean anything from drug-resistant
bacteria through
old-earth fossil progressions and common descent to 100%-natural
evolution of all biocomplexity, or it could mean a natural
development of something (such as the first life, or specific physical
structures like stars, solar systems, or geological formations) or a complete
evolution of everything in the universe during the entire history of nature, or
even
a non-scientific implication that "it all happened naturally, so God
is not necessary and does not exist," so we should always be careful to
distinguish between these different meanings.
This IF-IF-THEN dilemma — which can occur
when a Christian has rigid expectations about the when-and-how details of creation,
by insisting that
creation
MUST
have
happened
in a particular way — is not necessary, but is unfortunately common. A
rigidity regarding "what the Bible says about the when-and-how of creation" is
encouraged by enthusiastic advocates on both sides (by those who want to help
the gospel, and to hinder it) when they oversimplify complex issues, thus producing
a perception of conflict between religion and science.
This website examines one potential if-if-then conflict
in Age of the
Earth — Theology by
asking, "Is it wise to link The
Gospel of Jesus with A
Young Earth? Is it wise to view these two claims as a ‘package
deal’ where
either both are true or both are false?" Another aspect of this
theology-and-science question is in Age
of the Earth — Science.
Methods
of Creation is also a potential source of if-if-then tension, and I (the
editor) try to cope with the challenge of
appropriate humility (not too little, not too much) by asking "What
can a Christian believe about evolution?" in Sections 5A-5G of my FAQ
about Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design.
Science and Divine Action (natural-appearing
and miraculous-appearing)
What does science say about the possibility
of divine action? Nothing.
Science does not claim that "natural" means "without
God," and science does not contradict the Judeo-Christian belief
that God initially designed nature, then created nature and now constantly sustains
nature, and can guide nature (in a natural-appearing
way that blends smoothly with the normal operation of nature) so one natural
result occurs instead of another natural result.
Science does not claim that miracles are impossible. And
miracles are compatible with the logical methods of science; for effective
science we need a world that is usually natural, but it doesn't
have to be always natural. If, despite occasional miracles, the universe
usually operates according to normal natural patterns, science will be possible
and useful. A scientist can believe that, during the salvation
history of
humans, miracles were done by God
(as recorded in the Bible) and are being done now, and
were used by God during the formative history of nature.
Science says nothing about the possibility of
divine action (either natural-appearing or miraculous-appearing) but if a
Christian
thinks
that
believing in divine action is "unscientific" this can diminish the
quality of their spiritual life, as explained below.
Bible-Based Psychology and Christian Counseling
In counseling (and in friendships,
spiritual teaching, or mentoring) an
especially
relevant
science/religion
question is the relationship between psychology and
Christian faith: Does conventional psychology encourage a non-Biblical
view of human thoughts and emotions,
decisions
and actions?
In the Bible we see claims (in John 15:4-5, Galatians
5:22-23a, Philippians 1:9-11, Colossians 1:9-14, John 14-17, and elsewhere) that
God can
provide
spiritual support for believers, to give us what we need — faith,
hope, love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, self control, mercy, courage, strength,
wisdom,...
—
for
daily
living.
This
aspect of human life is excluded from conventional psychology, but it should
be included in a Christian psychology based on a Christian worldview: we
believe
that
God
is
caring
for
us,
that
He can change our situations, guide our
thoughts and actions, and He responds to prayer. Usually all of this happens
in a way that appears normal and natural, yet God is actively involved. We
should pray for these natural-appearing divine actions, and praise God for them.
Resources about Counseling and Counseling Education: Currently
there
are
none, but
eventually (although maybe not until early 2009) we'll
be
looking
for ways to develop useful resources for Bible-based counseling. As explained
below,
some
of
you
are
experts in this area, so developing it will happen sooner (and better)
if
you're willing to help
us.
A SITEMAP will
help you explore the website for Whole-Person Education (with
resources for Effective Education and Science-Theology
Interactions, using a Multiple-Views Approach) and other parts of
the ASA Website, plus TIPS
FOR TEACHERS.
You're an expert in your areas, so...
if you want to help us improve our website — for
example, if you have suggestions to make it better, or you've discovered
a great web-resource and you tell us about it so we can share it with others — your
assistance will be greatly appreciated. How
can you help?
This website for Whole-Person Education has TWO KINDS OF LINKS: an ITALICIZED LINK keeps you inside a page, moving you to another part of it, a NON-ITALICIZED LINK opens another page. Both keep everything inside this window, so your browser's BACK-button will always take you back to where you were. |
Here
are tips-pages (to supplement plus useful ideas for teachers and students in all
fields, |
This page, written by Craig Rusbult (editor
of education website), is
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/tips/faith.htm