Evolution - January 2000
By Date

Starting: Sat Jan 01 2000 - 19:47:14 EST
Ending: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:57:32 EST

• Re: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The KansasScienceEducationStandards) MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:56:53 EST)
• re: Michael Behe...by Palevitz Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:31:58 EST)
• Re: Behe by Palevitz MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:02:42 EST)
• RE: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The KansasScienceEducationStandards) Cliff Lundberg (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 13:41:31 EST)
• re: Behe by Palevitz Susan Brassfield (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 14:40:56 EST)
• re: Michael Behe...by Palevitz Susan Brassfield (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 14:36:51 EST)
• an aside amka@vcode.com (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 13:31:40 EST)
• re: Behe by Palevitz amka@vcode.com (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 13:24:53 EST)
• Re: What's *Really* Different Between Design and Evolution Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 07:55:25 EST)
• RE: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The KansasScienceEducationStandards) John E. Rylander (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 07:36:40 EST)
• Christianity deal offer michael@christianity.org.il (Mon Jan 31 2000 - 02:16:47 EST)
• re: Michael Behe...by Palevitz Stephen E. Jones (Sat Jan 29 2000 - 23:54:42 EST)
• Re: What's *Really* Different Between Design and Evolution MikeBGene@aol.com (Sun Jan 30 2000 - 14:36:35 EST)
• Re: What's *Really* Different Between Design and Evolution MikeBGene@aol.com (Sun Jan 30 2000 - 14:30:07 EST)
• Re: What's *Really* Different Between Design and Evolution Chris Cogan (Sat Jan 29 2000 - 22:47:41 EST)
• Re: Researchers build huge DNA chains -- able to create synthetic lifeforms w... MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Jan 29 2000 - 10:34:53 EST)
• Re: What's *Really* Different Between Design and Evolution MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Jan 29 2000 - 10:27:39 EST)
• Re: Michael Behe...by Palevitz Chris Cogan (Fri Jan 28 2000 - 21:16:32 EST)
• Elephant seals Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Jan 28 2000 - 20:28:39 EST)
• Re: Researchers build huge DNA chains -- able to create synthetic lifeforms within the next decade Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 21:52:33 EST)
• The Ultimate 747 in the Junkyard Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 21:25:36 EST)
• What's *Really* Different Between Design and Evolution Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 19:00:54 EST)
• Re: We Are Not Alone - Or Are We?, etc Stephen E. Jones (Fri Jan 28 2000 - 09:57:28 EST)
• Re: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas ScienceEducationStandards) MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Jan 28 2000 - 09:53:13 EST)
• re: Michael Behe...by Palevitz amka@vcode.com (Fri Jan 28 2000 - 00:55:04 EST)
• re: Michael Behe...by Palevitz amka@vcode.com (Fri Jan 28 2000 - 00:39:44 EST)
• Re: Secret of the stinkbird's stink lies in its gut Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 17:50:47 EST)
• Researchers build huge DNA chains -- able to create synthetic lifeforms within the next decade John E. Rylander (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 16:48:27 EST)
• RE: Michael Behe... by Palevitz John E. Rylander (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 10:17:59 EST)
• RE: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas ScienceEducationStandards) John E. Rylander (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 09:58:37 EST)
• Re: Chimps or chumps? Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 08:54:43 EST)
• Re: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas Science EducationStandards) MikeBGene@aol.com (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 08:34:47 EST)
• RE: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas Science EducationStandards) John E. Rylander (Thu Jan 27 2000 - 07:16:35 EST)
• Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards Cliff Lundberg (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 23:57:25 EST)
• Re: FW: Michael Behe... by Palevitz MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 23:46:48 EST)
• Re: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards) MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 23:40:49 EST)
• RE: Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards) John E. Rylander (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 23:07:40 EST)
• Evolution and Rape (was Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards) MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 22:22:32 EST)
• Re: Let's Teach Creationism Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 17:49:52 EST)
• Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 16:54:13 EST)
• Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards Susan Brassfield (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 14:40:05 EST)
• FW: Michael Behe... by Palevitz Susan Brassfield (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 14:24:24 EST)
• Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards Cliff Lundberg (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 14:10:49 EST)
• Let's Teach Creationism Susan Brassfield (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 13:56:05 EST)
• Re: The Kansas Science Education Standards Susan Brassfield (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 13:49:32 EST)
• The Kansas Science Education StandardsHi Susan, This is McCarthyism at it's wor Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 12:20:14 EST)
• The Kansas Science Education Standards Susan Brassfield (Wed Jan 26 2000 - 11:12:46 EST)
• On apparent appearances Chris Cogan (Tue Jan 25 2000 - 22:41:37 EST)
• Fwd: Baylor Naturalism Conference (April 12-15, 2000) -- update Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 25 2000 - 19:06:16 EST)
• Re: Scientist disputes fossil is 'missing link' between dinosaurs, birds etc Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 25 2000 - 07:24:06 EST)
• Re: Johnson, Darwin, and transitionals Chris Cogan (Mon Jan 24 2000 - 23:06:11 EST)
• Re: Johnson, Darwin, and transitionals MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 24 2000 - 09:43:03 EST)
• Re: Robert Wright on Steve Gould Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 24 2000 - 09:05:11 EST)
• Dinosaur - to - bird Arthur V. Chadwick (Mon Jan 24 2000 - 10:48:44 EST)
• Re: A cost/benefit analysis (was Jane Fonda has become a Christian!) Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 24 2000 - 05:56:45 EST)
• Re: Fred Hoyle's "Mathematics of Evolution" Cliff Lundberg (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:29:28 EST)
• Re: Robert Wright on Steve Gould Cliff Lundberg (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 18:32:49 EST)
• Re: Johnson, Darwin, and transitionals Chris Cogan (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 19:10:01 EST)
• Re: Fred Hoyle's "Mathematics of Evolution" Chris Cogan (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 17:24:45 EST)
• Re: Transitionals, Evidence, and Sleight-of-hand MikeBGene@aol.com (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 10:36:44 EST)
• Re: Robert Wright on Steve Gould Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 09:57:59 EST)
• Re: Fred Hoyle's "Mathematics of Evolution" Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 09:37:33 EST)
• Re: Transitionals, Evidence, and Sleight-of-hand Cliff Lundberg (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 16:45:47 EST)
• Re: Jane Fonda has become a Christian! Chris Cogan (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 14:07:10 EST)
• Transitionals, Evidence, and Sleight-of-hand Wesley R. Elsberry (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 13:52:25 EST)
• Re: Johnson, Darwin, and transitionals MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 09:10:33 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? MikeBGene@aol.com (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 09:02:23 EST)
• RAINFOREST and MARINE BIOLOGY WORKSHOPS Mike Nolan (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 00:01:18 EST)
• Re: Jane Fonda has become a Christian! Stephen E. Jones (Fri Jan 21 2000 - 21:38:04 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Stephen E. Jones (Fri Jan 21 2000 - 21:38:24 EST)
• RE: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? John E. Rylander (Fri Jan 21 2000 - 19:24:14 EST)
• RE: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? John E. Rylander (Fri Jan 21 2000 - 09:33:00 EST)
• Johnson, Darwin, and transitionals Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Jan 21 2000 - 02:11:44 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Jan 21 2000 - 00:38:00 EST)
• Johnson Blows It Again Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 23:06:15 EST)
• Re: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 22:36:35 EST)
• Re: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 22:26:06 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 22:23:35 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 22:09:21 EST)
• Re: Pop Quiz : Vertebrates make up what percentage of the animal kingdom?, etc Joel Duff (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 11:03:44 EST)
• Re: Pop Quiz : Vertebrates make up what percentage of the animal kingdom?, etc Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 09:45:53 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 23:33:42 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Tom Pearson (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 22:29:37 EST)
• Re: Jane Fonda has become a Christian! Chris Cogan (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 18:57:17 EST)
• Re: Jane Fonda has become a Christian! Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 16:58:45 EST)
• Re: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 11:13:54 EST)
• Re: Part II of reply to Stephen on my remarks about Johnson MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 09:48:15 EST)
• Re: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 09:30:30 EST)
• RE: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? John E. Rylander (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 02:34:05 EST)
• Re: Scientists create 'DNA computer', etc MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 00:53:53 EST)
• Re: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? MikeBGene@aol.com (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 00:32:45 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Chris Cogan (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 23:13:36 EST)
• Re: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? Chris Cogan (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 22:53:42 EST)
• Re: Information theory? Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 17:31:16 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 17:15:19 EST)
• Re: "Enormous Gulf"? Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 16:29:47 EST)
• RE: Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? John E. Rylander (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 17:09:53 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 16:29:07 EST)
• Any strong challenges to Naturalistic Sufficiency? Chris Cogan (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 16:14:24 EST)
• Part II of reply to Stephen on my remarks about Johnson Chris Cogan (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 16:05:08 EST)
• Re: Why Phillip Johnson is a Dangerous Man 1/2 Chris Cogan (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 23:19:58 EST)
• Feathered dinosaur a fake? Arthur V. Chadwick (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 16:57:45 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Susan B (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 13:50:08 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 12:27:12 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 11:55:59 EST)
• Exceedingly difficult to imagine Arthur V. Chadwick (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 11:24:51 EST)
• Re: Scientists create 'DNA computer', etc Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 08:21:17 EST)
• Re: Misrepresentation? Put up or shut up! (An Alternative to Dishonesty as the Cause of ...) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jan 16 2000 - 07:13:11 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Bill Payne (Sat Jan 15 2000 - 23:31:08 EST)
• Re: Why Phillip Johnson is a Dangerous Man 3/3 Stephen E. Jones (Sat Jan 15 2000 - 19:50:48 EST)
• Re: Why Phillip Johnson is a Dangerous Man 2/3 Stephen E. Jones (Sat Jan 15 2000 - 19:50:36 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 18:22:12 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 18:00:42 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 17:46:18 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Steve Clark (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 16:04:18 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Wayne Slattery (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 16:09:22 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Cliff Lundberg (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 15:13:23 EST)
• Information theory? Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 12:19:27 EST)
• Phillip Johnson is NOT a Dangerous Man Susan Brassfield (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 11:29:29 EST)
• Re: evolution and stewardship Wesley R. Elsberry (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 11:22:42 EST)
• RE: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? John E. Rylander (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 10:30:09 EST)
• Origin of Life Arthur V. Chadwick (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 11:48:28 EST)
• evolution and stewardship Arthur V. Chadwick (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 11:24:26 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? MikeBGene@aol.com (Fri Jan 14 2000 - 00:23:08 EST)
• Raup on evolution Arthur V. Chadwick (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 22:51:31 EST)
• If DNA can "compute," then maybe it can "evolve" too?! Ed.Babinski@furman.edu (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 19:31:52 EST)
• Modern science in the Bible? "LOGOS, speaking information, predicitve prophecies" Ed.Babinski@furman.edu (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 19:28:06 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Brian D Harper (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 21:39:35 EST)
• Re: Why Phillip Johnson is a Dangerous Man 1/2 Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 18:08:20 EST)
• Re: An Alternative to Dishonesty as the Cause of Persistent Misrepresentation of Ideas and Arguments Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 17:07:24 EST)
• RE: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? John E. Rylander (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 17:00:57 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Chris Cogan (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 16:05:33 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Stephen E. Jones (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 13:15:15 EST)
• self organization Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 11:55:18 EST)
• "Enormous Gulf"? Wesley R. Elsberry (Thu Jan 13 2000 - 09:54:30 EST)
• Re: Company Has Sequences of 90 Pct of Human Genome, etc Cliff Lundberg (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 20:55:45 EST)
• RE: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? John E. Rylander (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 18:26:35 EST)
• Microgod Chris Cogan (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 17:48:39 EST)
• Re: Company Has Sequences of 90 Pct of Human Genome, etc Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 16:43:35 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? Chris Cogan (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 15:44:08 EST)
• Dangerous critics of Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 12:11:07 EST)
• Darwin on Darwin Arthur V. Chadwick (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 12:37:06 EST)
• Re: Elaine Morgan's question (was Seven) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 08:41:04 EST)
• Re: no pre-Cambrian rabbits! Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 08:19:52 EST)
• Re: What is the evidence that atheism is *true*? (was Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 09:47:58 EST)
• Re: ID and Science Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 09:44:40 EST)
• I'm so upset..... Huxter4441@aol.com (Wed Jan 12 2000 - 09:34:39 EST)
• Why Phillip Johnson is a Dangerous Man Chris Cogan (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 23:14:42 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Brian D Harper (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 21:45:23 EST)
• Re: Does science `cover-up'? The case of Walther Loeb (was Why did progress fail?, etc) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 17:46:56 EST)
• no pre-Cambrian rabbits! Cliff Lundberg (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 14:57:57 EST)
• Re: An Alternative to Dishonesty as the Cause of Persistent Misrepresentation of Ideas and Arguments Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 16:02:17 EST)
• Seven Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 11:54:39 EST)
• Re: Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic Chris Cogan (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 22:54:34 EST)
• Re: Why Does the University Fear Phillip Johnson? Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 10:54:45 EST)
• Re: Darwinism's risky prediction: no pre-Cambrian rabbits! (was TIME: Charles Darwin - iconoclast ...) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 09:03:28 EST)
• Re: Why Does the University Fear Phillip Johnson? Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 11 2000 - 08:11:07 EST)
• Re: Are the schools really neutral? Susan B (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 22:13:31 EST)
• An Alternative to Dishonesty as the Cause of Persistent Misrepresentation of Ideas and Arguments Chris Cogan (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 21:45:43 EST)
• Re: Does science `cover-up'? The case of Walther Loeb (was Why did progress fail?, etc) Brian D Harper (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 21:52:29 EST)
• Re: Hydrothermal vents too hot? (was Why did progress fail?, etc) Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 17:13:03 EST)
• Re: Does science `cover-up'? The case of Walther Loeb (was Why did progress fail?, etc) Stephen E. Jones (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 17:07:16 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 16:52:59 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Brian D Harper (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 12:54:49 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 10 2000 - 07:57:43 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Brian D Harper (Sun Jan 09 2000 - 22:51:07 EST)
• Re: Abortion Rates Fell to Near 20-Year Low in 1997, etc. Stephen E. Jones (Sun Jan 09 2000 - 06:22:59 EST)
• new items on my web page glenn morton (Sat Jan 08 2000 - 10:40:45 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Cliff Lundberg (Sat Jan 08 2000 - 14:58:18 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Stephen E. Jones (Fri Jan 07 2000 - 08:12:29 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Cliff Lundberg (Thu Jan 06 2000 - 13:41:08 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Susan Brassfield (Thu Jan 06 2000 - 10:48:56 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Cliff Lundberg (Wed Jan 05 2000 - 21:46:16 EST)
• Re: Why did progress fail?, etc Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 05 2000 - 17:20:04 EST)
• Re: Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic Stephen E. Jones (Wed Jan 05 2000 - 10:12:18 EST)
• Re: Dembski's detecting MikeBGene@aol.com (Tue Jan 04 2000 - 21:27:06 EST)
• Re: Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic Susan Brassfield (Tue Jan 04 2000 - 17:39:08 EST)
• Re: Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic Stephen E. Jones (Tue Jan 04 2000 - 16:24:19 EST)
• Dembski's detecting Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Jan 04 2000 - 09:54:57 EST)
• Re: Dembski's detecting MikeBGene@aol.com (Tue Jan 04 2000 - 02:06:38 EST)
• Re: Many Worlds? MikeBGene@aol.com (Tue Jan 04 2000 - 01:48:57 EST)
• Re: Many Worlds? Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 20:21:59 EST)
• Re: Many Worlds? MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 14:36:36 EST)
• Re: ID and Science MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 14:09:35 EST)
• Re: Many Worlds? Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:58:11 EST)
• Re: Many Worlds? MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:45:14 EST)
• Dembski's detecting Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:43:20 EST)
• Re: ID and Science Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:35:40 EST)
• Re: ID and Science MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:22:15 EST)
• Many Worlds? Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:12:35 EST)
• Re: ID and Science Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 13:01:34 EST)
• Re: ID and Science MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 12:51:23 EST)
• Re: ID and Science Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 12:32:03 EST)
• ID and Science Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 12:20:47 EST)
• Re: Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 11:35:57 EST)
• ID and Science - Part II MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 11:21:45 EST)
• ID and Science - Part I MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 11:20:44 EST)
• Bertrand Russell--Way off Topic Susan Brassfield (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 11:01:21 EST)
• Reviewing Singer MikeBGene@aol.com (Mon Jan 03 2000 - 10:57:46 EST)
• Re: Adaptation: 1. tautological?, 2. irreducibly complex? Stephen E. Jones (Sat Jan 01 2000 - 19:46:55 EST)

Last message date: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:57:32 EST
Archived on: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:57:36 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 17:57:36 EST