Re: Janet posts to T.O. as well
Ed Brayton (cynic@net-link.net)
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:19:14 -0500Pim van Meurs wrote:
>
> Some good postings on TO have destroyed any idea that Petersen understood what he was discussing wrt loess, thunderstorms etc.
> It is interesting to see how pseudo-science does not stand up to scientific scrutiny.
>
> Now the question is: Will Janet put up a rebuttal on her webpage or pretend that none had been given ?
>
> We shall see...
She already responded to one by saying that her husband didn't allow her
to speak to "ruffians". And this was a perfectly civil message that
focused only on the formation of thunderstorms. Watch her wiggle, see
her jiggle.... You can shoot logic at her feet and watch her dance.
Ed