RE: God's time

From: Alexanian, Moorad (alexanian@uncw.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 13:32:15 EDT

  • Next message: Dick Fischer: "Re: ID science (subtopic 2)"

    All human reasoning is based on human constructs. Only the self in
    humans is not a construct and indicates self-consciousness. All other
    human activities, for instance, language, our attempt to study physical
    nature, etc., are based on human reasoning, which invariable leads to
    mental constructs.

    Moorad

    -----Original Message-----
    From: igevolution@earthlink.net [mailto:igevolution@earthlink.net]
    Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:44 AM
    To: asa@calvin.edu
    Subject: God's time

    Don wrote:
    Theology likewise has no basis except to the degree that it derives from
    actual experience of God.
    _________
    Jim wrote:
    Theology is essentially a man-made construct (or rather, a gajillion of
    them!), even if informed by revelation. It's not monolithic. Rather, it
    is unique for each of us, with some aspects shared with others to a
    degree that allows us to fellowship and build community...much as we are
    doing here!
    _________

    Holy screaming alarm-clocks, batman!

    Theology is a human construct (as my friendly opponent- for-the-moment,
    Jim Anderson has stated), but that does not negate the veracity of it.
    Theology is about authentic exegesis of the divinely inspired and
    inerranct word of God. The cannon of scripture is the foundation, not
    personal experience. If theology were derived only from personal
    experience, then true theology for me would be different from true
    theology for you, as you and I have had different experiences.
    Obviously, the truth of who God is and how He relates to and saves us is
    absolutely true, apart from either of our opinions. Consequently, there
    must be an absolutely true theology. The only foundation for a common,
    shared theology is scripture. Not personal experience.

    You and I are free to differ on our interpretation of scripture; this
    discussion is justifiably academic and authentic, but we must agree that
    the discussion of such matters is based on interpretation of scripture,
    not experience. We must also agree that there is an absolutely true
    answer to such questions. We can banter all day about what we feel that
    answer is, but we mustn't think that your answer and my answer, being
    different, can both be right. Let us not slide into post-modernism with
    regard to theology. God is absolute, and His truths are likewise. We
    must struggle to discover them, not fabricate our own.

    Jason



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 25 2003 - 13:32:50 EDT