From: Josh Bembenek (jbembe@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:31:04 EDT
George-
Your condescension is quite offensive.
Obviously I cannot understand you, and thus this conversation and
clafirication of your point is a waste of your time.
I'll leave you alone.
Josh
>From: George Murphy <gmurphy@raex.com>
>To: Josh Bembenek <jbembe@hotmail.com>
>CC: asa@calvin.edu
>Subject: Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID
>Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:16:44 -0400
>
>Josh Bembenek wrote:
> >
> > Paul is NOT arguing here for natural theology. He says that people
>should
> > be able to know God in creation but that they distort this knowledge and
> > worship idols.
> >
> > The attempt to know God from nature, independently of revelation,
>usually
> > results in the construction of idols - of which the Intelligent Designer
>or
> > the God who "left his fingerprints all over the evidence" may be
>examples.
> >
> > So which is it, do we know of God's invisible qualities from nature or
>not?
>
> Read the part of my post that you omitted above, as well as my earlier
>post to
>which you responded.
> George
>
>
>George L. Murphy
>gmurphy@raex.com
>http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:31:26 EDT