Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 13:19:52 EDT

  • Next message: Josh Bembenek: "Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID"

    Josh Bembenek wrote:
    >
    > George-
    >
    > Your condescension is quite offensive.
    >
    > Obviously I cannot understand you, and thus this conversation and
    > clafirication of your point is a waste of your time.
    >
    > I'll leave you alone.

            A person who cites an earlier post in abbreviated & thus distorted form, with no
    indication that there has been an omission, & then poses a "Then which is it?" demand
    has no business complaining about being "offended." & if its condescending to expect
    people to read the things they're responding to, so be it.

                                                    George
                             

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 13:20:59 EDT