Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:16:44 EDT

  • Next message: Josh Bembenek: "Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID"

    Josh Bembenek wrote:
    >
    > Paul is NOT arguing here for natural theology. He says that people should
    > be able to know God in creation but that they distort this knowledge and
    > worship idols.
    >
    > The attempt to know God from nature, independently of revelation, usually
    > results in the construction of idols - of which the Intelligent Designer or
    > the God who "left his fingerprints all over the evidence" may be examples.
    >
    > So which is it, do we know of God's invisible qualities from nature or not?

            Read the part of my post that you omitted above, as well as my earlier post to
    which you responded.
                                                    George
            

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:16:50 EDT