From: igevolution@earthlink.net
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 14:28:19 EST
RFaussette@aol.com writes:
That's Ken Ham from an AiG newsletter - if you could demonstrate that the morality remained after the creationism died he might (or others like him) be more likely to consider your position. But from what Ham says above, no Christian scientist has conclusively demonstrated that Biblical morality would remain if evolutionary arguments were incorporated.
I'm sorry, but that's rediculous. What does Christian Morality hinge on? It hinges on the nature of God and our status as creatures "in His image." It hinges on the decrees given us in the law and our utter inability to meet them. Whether or not God used mechanistic processes to carry out his creative intent has nothing to do with the question. Nor does how long ago that creative process began. That is the biggest red-herring argument I've ever heard.
Jason Alley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 14:25:05 EST