Folks,
I commend the effort that Roy has made, but I am afraid the poll is
flawed because Roy did not make or modify the questions enough to
address his own research questions or modify it for a different
audience. I know there were questions the reflected the original
pollsters, who didn't understand some of the Christian positions and as
I indicated earlier should have been reworded. Unfortunately I don't
think the poll sampled a percentage of any group or even randomly
sampled any groups. That being the case, one can not validly generalize
beyond the folks who took it. Unless you know you have a representative
or random sample of a population generalities simply can not be validly
made beyond the folks who responded to the poll.
Yes, the results in this sample may be indicative of things that should
be checked out but I really think few conclusions can be drawn to the
larger populations of scientists who have different positions on
origins.
If more work had been done on modifying questions and thinking about
sampling methodology, the poll would have results that could be very
interesting.
-- James and Florence Mahaffy 712 722-0381 (Home) 227 S. Main St. 712 722-6279 (Office) Sioux Center, IA 51250
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 25 2000 - 21:03:52 EST