> Randy Landrum wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Glenn Morton wrote:
> >
> >> Randy Landrum wrote:
> >>
> >> >I do believe in a younger than billion year old earth I may not be the
> >> >normal yec but I believe that science is the systematized knowledge
> >> >derived from observation. It is a branch of knowledge, esp. one that
> >> >systematizes facts, principles, and methods. According to my
> > understanding
> >> >evolution does not fit that definition.
> >>
> >> What is the evidence that makes you believe that the earth is less than 4
> >> billion years old and how old do you believe it to be?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The Bible book of Genesis.
>
> Fair enough. So then science has nothing to do with it. Why do you care then
> what science says? What is the point of engaging in any discussions about the
> data for or against evolution? I think your actions betray a desire to have
> the observations match your interpretation of the Bible.
> glenn
>
I care about both. Can't one, for instance, like peanutbutter and jelly? I
also care (like I am sure many others) about the dangers of the
propagation of bad science or rather religion which really is not science
but rather sticking a high brow label on a sow's ear. Some say it's
creation other say it's evolution.
-Randy