Re: [asa] What Does ID Add?

From: George Murphy <gmurphy@raex.com>
Date: Sun Sep 09 2007 - 14:57:36 EDT

Gregory -

I respectfully request that you stop misrepresenting my views on this list, as in the 2 examples below. I do not, & have never said that I do, "prefer" the term TE to EC. (I have pointed out that both terms have their limits, & have observed that established terminology, ideal or not, is hard to change.) & secondly, my view of divine action is not remotely "deist." I have repeatedly said that God is involved in everything that happens in the world.

If you can't say anything accurate about my views then please don't say anything at all.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Gregory Arago
  To: Steve Martin ; John Walley
  Cc: Peter Loose ; David Opderbeck ; AmericanScientificAffiliation
  Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 1:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [asa] What Does ID Add?

  .........................
  Thus, I propose that EC be added to this thread's scope (i.e. not just OEC/ID and TE) in order to give a more accurate picture of those who dialogue at ASA, i.e. who commonly prefer EC (this includes Keith Miller and David Campbell among others) to TE (this includes George Murphy's 'you're not going to get rid of TE' rhetoric).
  .........................

  My two-bits for concepts/ideas that I think should be added in answer to David O.'s OP question are those of 'intervention' (vs., e.g. George's 'divine hidden-ness' and non-interventionists/deists) and 'pattern recognition.'

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Sep 9 14:59:21 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 09 2007 - 14:59:21 EDT