Re: TheologyWeb

Also one can be "anonymous' -- in that nobody would ever recognize you.

At first I signed up as " wallyshoes" but got rejected for reasons.

Anyhow, I drop "clues" all over the place. Even Glen Morton cannot figure
out who I am under my pseudo name. He makes guesses -- but to the wrong
person.

Burgy also has to defend his view without knowing who disagrees and here
are many (sometimes including me)

It it a bit of fun -- but I am a non-entity anyhow. Those who are famous
can use any name at all, I guess.

I drop "clues" and nobody has yet to "get them"

. In fact I dropped clues of other personalities in ASA.

It is fun! Burgy and Morton still fail to see that I may have a "apple"
also.
Try it!

Walt

BTW -- Most TWEBBER posts are not scholarly!

.

Walt

John W Burgeson wrote:

> I was asked about TheologyWeb statistics.
>
> TW has currently 4361 registered members. Presumably some have left the
> forum so the current number is somewhat less than that.
>
> There have been, in the 13 or so months since it started,
>
> 20,000+ threads started
> 510,000+ posts made.
>
> The level of conversation there can be scholarly -- or inane. It is
> fairly easy to disregard the frivolous threads.
>
> It is web based -- one's "immortal prose" will be there (if not
> "moderated") a long time.
>
> It is OK to criticize ICR and AIG, but do so carefully.
>
> Burgy
>
>
> www.burgy.50megs.com
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

--
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================