From: Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:54:49 EDT
Howard Van Till wrote in part
> In essence, Meyer appeals to biological examples to argue that if the Robust
> Formational Economy Principle is false, then ID must be true. Putting these
> two arguments side by side, it looks like the old trick line, "Heads I win,
> tails you lose." ( p. 194)
>
I understand your point, and you successfully contrast this
with remarkable brevity, but let me be as it were the Devil's
advocate (hmm here on a Christian list). :-)
<ID_cap_on>
You have argued that there is sufficient form conferring
capacity to build stars and planets, and to bring about all the
necessary conditions for building the earth. However, what
this form conferring capacity does not extend to is the
formation of life (or at least intelligent life).
</ID_cap_on>
I have some idea what I would say to this, but I am wondering
what you would say.
By Grace alone we proceed,
Wayne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:55:28 EDT