Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID

From: Don Winterstein (dfwinterstein@msn.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 05:51:59 EDT

  • Next message: RDehaan237@aol.com: "Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID"

    Good response!

    Don

    George wrote:

    > It's often hard to disentangle the effects of "revelation" (by which I mean
    > "special revelation" if one wants a category of "general revelation" as well) and
    > experience. Remember that Augustine's mother was Christian & that there were a lot of
    > Christian influences on him as he was growing up. Of course his mother's influence
    > wasn't "revelation" in the sense that the burning bush, e.g., was but it (like other
    > Christian teaching) ultimately derives from revelation. Thus revelation played some
    > role in his early life - as is the case with many people in a country like the US who
    > aren't Christians but who in some degree or other have been exposed to symbols, stories,
    > &c from the biblical tradition.
    > & certainly there are aspects of other religions, philosophies &c that have
    > things in common with the Judaeo-Christian tradition. One doesn't need revelation to
    > conclude that there's one God, though you may have no clue _who_ that God is. There's
    > good stuff in Plato (some of which, interestingly, some of the Fathers thought he'd
    > gotten from reading Moses!) But there's also other stuff, & Neoplatonism wasn't an
    > unmixed blessing for Augustine. E.g., it - & also his experience as a Manichaean - gave
    > him negative attitudes toward the body that he never completely got over.
    > By "revelation" in the primary sense I do _not_ mean Scripture, which is the
    > authoritative witness to revelation. We don't know precisely how revelation came to
    > many of the people in the OT - "In many and various ways God spoke to our fathers by the
    > prophets." My broad characterization of revelation is "God's actions in the history of
    > history which reach their culmination in the cross and resurrection of Christ." But the
    > community which receives that revelation becomes a witness to it with the task of
    > continuing to proclaim it.
    > I do not deny the possibility of special revelation outside this community: The
    > Holy Spirit can act when & where the Spirit wills. But one has to be very cautious
    > about this because of the dangers of people mistaking their own fantasies for
    > inspiration. In the present discussion what I'm dubious about is the idea that there is
    > a "general revelation" kind of out there in the world & accessible to human
    > investigation, kind of like scientific data. Sin means that people run away from the
    > true God, like Adam & Eve. We don't find God, God finds us.
    > I agree with the sense of your last paragraph, but people who set up idols
    > generally don't do so with the _intention_ of abandoning the true God or detouring
    > around him. They think that what they're worshipping _is_ the ultimate power in which
    > they should place their trust. "Mortal, these men have taken their idols into their
    > hearts" (Ez.14:3).



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:34:39 EDT