From: Bill Payne (bpayne15@juno.com)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 23:03:18 EST
I think you folks are hanging up on the limited aspect of morality. My
understanding of Ken Ham's view is that the Bible is an integrated whole,
and to pull out one thread (creation) would cause the entire Book to
unravel. Ken included morality, but did not limit the damage to
morality. I tend to agree, although I realize there is room for
interpretation of passages (and science as well).
Bill
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:53:42 EST RFaussette@aol.com writes:
If a scientist could reassure Ham that there is a rational basis for the
morality, he might not care that it was a rational explanation as long as
it preserved his Biblical morality.
“If Christian leaders have told the next generation that one can accept
the world’s teachings in geology, biology, astronomy, etc., and use these
to (re)interpret God’s Word, then the door has been opened for this to
happen in every area, including morality.”
rich
________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 23:19:03 EST