From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 07:22:40 EST
In a message dated 4/3/03 1:30:13 AM Eastern Standard Time,
michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk writes:
> So many Christians are so naive that they want to believe YEC rubbish. It
> would be uncharitable to call i t anyhting else.
>
>
“If Christian leaders have told the next generation that one can accept the
world’s teachings in geology, biology, astronomy, etc., and use these to
(re)interpret God’s Word, then the door has been opened for this to happen in
every area, including morality.”32
That's Ken Ham from an AiG newsletter - if you could demonstrate that the
morality remained after the creationism died he might (or others like him) be
more likely to consider your position. But from what Ham says above, no
Christian scientist has conclusively demonstrated that Biblical morality
would remain if evolutionary arguments were incorporated. It is the morality
Ham wants to maintain, not the science. He damns the science for threatening
the morality. My experience is that vast numbers of people don't want the
morality including scientists and the clergy so the churches are being
watered down to accept the immoral rather then looking for reasons to uphold
the morality like Ken Ham does. Levitical law promotes healthy population
demographics and a cohesive society. It is true, that vast numbers of people
cannot appreciate evolutionary arguments when the topic is religion but no
one has yet written a piece that would reconcile the religion with the
science although many have claimed to like the recent Darwin's Cathedral by
Wilson (he hints and provides clues but falls short).
rich
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 07:24:30 EST