Bob Gilm wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I'd like to share with you this momentous insight I
> had yesterday evening, after thoughtful consideration
> of the number of toes in my left foot, and how it is
> exactly the same as in my right foot. The number 5 is
> significantly larger than Planck's constant, h (6.6262
> x 10^-34 J-s). However, since Plank showed that that
> the energy of an oscillator of frequency v is
> quantised, and the number of toes in my foot is also
> discrete, I conclude that Hammond's SPOG is wrong.
> This is not surprising at this point, since any idiot
> could have seen that. In its place, I would like to
> present the SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT NOBODY CARES ABOUT
> WHAT HAMMOND SAYS (SPTNCAWHS).
[Hammond]
Newton once said:
"In lieu of all other evidence, I take the
human thumb to be sufficient evidence of
the existence of God"
(Isaac Newton)
Now, if you don't understand that statement, I suggest
you watch your step in these discussions, because some
people do know what it means (it's double entender BTW).
As for the scientific facts, the body is constructed from
"cartesian-binary cell cleavage" and the reason we have
5 fingers is because first we had One, then it cleaved into
2, then each of those cleaved into 2 giving us 4. Finally one
of the 4 cleaved into 2 giving us 5. Simple binary cleavage.
>
> Now, serious. Hammond, nobody on this list cares about
> what you say, particularly your SPOG. Nobody here
> thinks that it is of any use. We are not qualified to
> understand it anyways, according to you.
[Hammond]
Well, that's the problem... everybody is here to fight, and
nobody is here to INQUIRE. This is abnormal behavior. The
principle function of discussion is to find out things,
language is not supposed to be a forensic psychological weapon.
> So, why do
> you waste your valuable time with us? Why don't you
> spend this time trying to publish your SPOG in a
> peer-reviewed journal?
[Hammond]
That's the problem. There's something wrong with the
establishment, not only in the government, but in science too.
Fact is, you can't publish a paper entitled "the scientific
proof of God" in a reputable journal... there aren't even
reputable scientists who will discuss such a thing. So,
like Jesus, I find my self talking to the Publicans and
the disabled.
They used to ask Jesus.. "If you know so much why aren't you
up at the Temple or the University or the parliament telling
them about it?" Are you kidding, THEY are the reason I'm down here
telling you about it.
They're all too busy making 6 figure salaries studying the Big Bang,
Outer Space, Fractal Geometry, Fuzzy logic, Chaos theory, and
"Theories of Everything" to be bothered listening to a scientific
discovery that is going to save billions of the poverty stricken,
ease the struggle of the middle class, and dramatically raise
the world Standard of Living. Why should they care about that
when they're making 100 Grand a year and have air-conditioning,
free air travel and a private parking space?
None of these hundreds of amateurs who are flaming me are actually
against me, they're just trying not to blow their cover. It's the
big shots, the stuff shirts, the high and the mighty and the elite
overpriveleged who don't want there to be any rabble rousing
"scientific proofs of God." When the chips go down between the
haves and the have nots in this world fella, you're going to find
yourself in my army, not theirs, ya know. Do you really think
Dick Cheney who made $36,000,000 dollars last year gives a damn
about you? Do you think he cares about a "scientific proof of God"?
> Cheers,
>
> Bob
>
sure
-- Be sure to visit my website below, and please ask your news service provider to add alt.sci.proof-of-god ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 18 2001 - 12:56:50 EDT