Re: Evolution scores vs SAT scores. What else would you expect?

From: Doug Hayworth (hayworth@uic.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:03:02 EDT

  • Next message: SteamDoc@aol.com: "Re: Omphalos"

    At 09:40 AM 10/6/00 -0400, you wrote:
    >The failure of our students in science and math is what we should be
    >addressing rather that the damn issue of whether evolution should be taught
    >in public schools or not. Evolution has nothing to say on almost all
    >research being done in biology and medicine, whether technical or basic
    >research. Witness the fact that almost 100% of the physics done has
    >nothing whatsoever to do with the Big Bang. The precise same thing is true
    >with the theory of evolution. Moorad

    That we should be concerned with the RRRs does NOT rightfully mean we
    should neglect all other aspects of learning as unimportant. The study
    which sparked this discussion was concerned with the teaching of evolution,
    not with all of education; was anyone claiming that it was an exact
    indicator of the all aspects of education? That said, I believe it may be
    fair to consider what a ranking with respect to teaching of evolution
    reflects about the general approach to liberal arts education taken by each
    state; having a sound approach to understanding scientific information and
    evidence is hugely important for how one thinks in general. More
    specifically, the basic principles of evolution and geology are immensely
    relevant to current issues facing humankind, especially related to ecology
    and the environment. Without an appreciation and understanding of the
    timescales involved in various biological and geological processes, we
    cannot meaningfully evaluate dynamics and proposed policies relating to
    renewable versus nonrenewable natural resources, environmental impacts of
    pollution, endangerment and conservation of species populations, the ethics
    and potential risks relating to the "escape" into the wild of genetically
    modified organisms, and the prediction of viral evolution relating to
    anticipation of this season's vaccines, etc. If one simply denies any kind
    of evidence relating to things like radiometric dating, population
    genetics, rates of mutation and adaptation and speciation, one is
    completely unprepared to begin thinking about such things.

    Doug



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:03:13 EDT