FW: Halloween/Evolution Tract

From: glenn morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:04:50 EDT

  • Next message: Doug Hayworth: "Re: Evolution scores vs SAT scores. What else would you expect?"

    Oops I forgot to send this to the asa
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: glenn morton [mailto:glenn.morton@btinternet.com]
    > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 6:46 AM
    > To: Dale K. Stalnaker
    > Subject: RE: Halloween/Evolution Tract
    >
    >
    > Hi Dale,
    >
    > You wrote:
    >
    > > While listening to a local (Cleveland) Christian radio station this
    > > evening, I heard
    > > about a evangelical Christian ministry called "Halloween
    > > Outreach!". Their
    > > web site
    > > is at <http://www.halloweenoutreach.com/>.
    > >
    > > During this time of the year, this ministry sells packets of
    > tracts called
    > > "Halloween Outreach! cards" to spread the Gospel (see
    > > http://www.halloweenoutreach.com/cards.html). One card is an
    > > anti-evolution tract from the Institute for Creation Research (ICR). It
    > > has the caption "They're Big, They're Ferocious, and They're real!" and
    > > questions
    > > whether or not dinos are million of years old. According to the ICR,
    > > evolutionary theory has "one slight problem...recently a
    > dinosaur bone was
    > > discovered that still contained blood cells!"
    > >
    > > This sounds very bogus, but does anyone at ASA know the real story about
    > > this "fossil evidence" for a young earth?
    > >
    > > The tract concludes with "Where did life begin? Scientists point to a
    > > giant explosion, and millions of years of evolution. Christians hold to
    > > the biblical account that God personally created the animals... that we
    > > know today." This implies that young-earth creationism is necessary for
    > > Christian faith and that it is impossible for Christians to
    > accept either
    > > the Big Bang, evolution, or a multi-billion-year-old earth.
    > Since the ICR
    > > is so successful propagating this nonsense, it is no wonder that many
    > > scientifically-literate people have a difficult time with Christianity.
    > >
    > > Dale Stalnaker
    > >
    > >
    >
    > Like much of what ICR does, it is a mixture of misreading,
    > misunderstanding, and pure fiction. The authors did not find
    > blood cells. The original report is to be found in Proc. Natl.
    > Acad. Sci. USA Vol 94 pp 6291-6296 June 1997. The authors found
    > Heme compounds, not cells.
    >
    > Here is what the NY Times said about it. This article is no
    > longer on their web page, but can be found at their archive site.
    > This is not the entire article.
    >
    > June 10, 1997
    >
    >
    > Blood of Tyrannosaur Recovered From Montana Fossil
    >
    > By NICHOLAS WADE
    >
    > Scientists say they have recovered elements of blood from the
    > bones of a dinosaur that died some 65 million years ago. This
    > is the first time that blood components have been recovered from
    > dinosaur bones, and the nearest that science has come to the
    > science fiction fantasy of recreating the creatures from the
    > genetic information in their blood cells.
    >
    > The dinosaur, a nearly complete Tyrannosaurus rex, was buried in
    > conditions that prevented its bones from being converted to
    > mineral, as is the case with most fossils. The interior of the
    > bones are preserved largely in their original form.
    >
    > Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, a paleontologist at Montana State
    > University in Bozeman, recovered the specimen from the Hells
    > Creek formation of eastern Montana. Because of the bones' state
    > of preservation, she decided to look for direct signs of life,
    > like cells, DNA and protein.
    >
    > The recovery of ancient molecules is fascinating but treacherous
    > terrain on which many scientists have stumbled. The more
    > sensitive the analytical technique, the higher the risk of
    > picking up molecules that have contaminated the original
    > specimen. The DNA that a team of Utah scientists recently
    > asserted that they had recovered from 80?million?year?old
    > dinosaur bones was later said by other researchers to be of human origin.
    >
    > Because of such setbacks, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues
    > proceeded with caution and took several years to
    > publish their results.
    >
    > Earlier hopes of finding cells in the dinosaur bone have been
    > dashed. Dr. Schweitzer said she could see no direct sign of
    > cells, although a chemical stain that recognizes DNA picked up
    > something in the holes where the bone cells would have rested.
    >
    > But she said she had been unable to retrieve DNA that could be
    > identified as originating in a dinosaur.
    >
    > She and her colleagues had better luck in looking for heme, the
    > oxygen?carrying part of the hemoglobin molecule of the blood.
    >
    > They report finding evidence for the presence of heme by six
    > different chemical tests in an article published in Tuesday's
    > issue of The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
    > **end excerpt
    >
    > glenn
    >
    > see http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
    > for lots of creation/evolution information
    > >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:01:21 EDT