In a message dated 6/22/2000 10:22:37 PM, burgy@compuserve.com writes:
<< Keenan wrote:
" Have others read this book and do you find
it a helpful contribution to the flood debate?"
Burgy wrote:
"I read it -- then bought it. Found it highly credible.
Glenn did not. He is much more conservative
than me however, searching for more coherence between
actual earth history and scripture than I need to have."
Burgy >>
I too read the book, and found it more credible than Glenn's flood theory.
His is much like Ryan and Pitman's, except that it takes place in the basin
of the Mediterranean millions of years ago rather than in the Black Sea
thousands of years ago. The time frame of _Noah's Flood_ fits the Biblical
account better. There are too many problems with Glenn's theory, not the
least of which is that there is no way to verify his highly problematic idea
that human life existed in the desiccated, scorching basin of the Med before
it was refilled.
Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 05:29:09 EDT