At 07:09 AM 2/29/00 -0500, George Murphy wrote:
>> I didn't see the solution to this. If I missed it my apologies. Why is 126
>> the solution? Color me slow here.
>
> The numbers _could_ be those of the sequence {(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(n-4)(n-5) + n}
>for n = 1, 2, .... . But they could be lots of other sequences too.
Yep, I shoulda thunk a that function. :-)
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 19:33:42 EST