Perelandra

From: Charles F. Austerberry (cfauster@creighton.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2000 - 12:39:57 EST

  • Next message: Ted Davis: "Fwd:"

    My 10-year old son has read all of C.S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia, and
    is now using audio books-on-tape from our local library to "read" Lewis's
    science fiction trilogy (Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, and That
    Hideous Strength). I remember reading those books years ago, and am
    delighted that my son is now.

    Lewis is a particular challenge for me as I struggle with relating The Fall
    and evolution. A recurring theme of Lewis's writings is that we should
    beware of modern (postmodern ?) theories that diminish the scandal and/or
    reality of evil. In the book _Perelandra_, Lewis has all sorts of common
    modern ideas, some quite specifically related to evolution, articulated by
    a character named Weston. The previously materialistic physicist Weston
    comes to realize the supreme importance of spirituality and the spirit
    world, but he doesn't distinguish between good and evil spirits. In fact,
    Weston becomes a virtual incarnation of evil when fully possessed by the
    diabolical.

    Here's my basic question: how can we continue to recognize the reality and
    significance of evil, which is so clearly presented in the Genesis story of
    the Fall and its aftermath, while also accepting physical death and human
    origins through evolution as part of God's good creation? A related
    question is the origin of evil itself. If the Garden of Eden was not a
    specific place in time nor an accurate representation of a situation that
    actually ever existed in human (and pre-human) evolution, how do we
    understand the aftermath of the Fall? The aftermath indeed seems to be a
    pretty accurate representation of our actual, existential condition. The
    problem is what to make of the Garden, "before" the Fall. If evil existed
    long before humans, did evil "taint" evolution? If so, what would
    "untainted" evolution, the kind of evolution God "intended," have looked
    like?

    As an evolutionary biologist, I'd prefer emotionally to view the
    evolutionary history of earth as wholly God's good creation. For example,
    here's how Keith B. Miller, a geologist at Kansas State University,
    interpreted and articulated an insight extensively developed by George
    Murphy (Miller cites Murphy in his paper):

    "Death and pain need not be understood as satanic corruptions of the
    created order. Rather they reflect the nature of a God who has suffered and
    died for the life of His creatures. Life from death - this is the Biblical
    pattern and the pattern of creation. There is congruity here, not
    irreconcilable contrast. In the natural world life springs from the
    material of the dead, the Earth itself is formed of material created in the
    cataclysms of exploding stars. The image of resurrection is everywhere to
    be seen. That the God who became flesh and died for the life of His
    creatures should so design the world from its inception seems to me the
    most perfect of cosmic metaphors." (from "Theological Implications of an
    Evolving Creation" by Keith B. Miller, published in _Perspectives on
    Science and Christian Faith_ 45, pp. 150-160, 1993, and available in
    condensed form on-line at
    http://mcgraytx.calvin.edu/ASA/PSCF9-93Miller.html).

    I like that a lot, but I'm left with a feeling that C.S. Lewis would want
    me to also bring in the question of evil somehow. George Murphy has some
    ideas on this, I know, though he (like every honest and wise thinker on
    this, I suspect) admits that the origin of evil is a mystery.

    Even if we can't solve that mystery, I'm hoping that we can at least
    integrate a solid, orthodox Christian understanding of sin and evil with a
    solid, valid scientific understanding of the earth's evolutionary history.
    C.S. Lewis, for all his wonderful insights, seemed to regard evolution too
    dismissively for my tastes. Has anyone seen a good critique of C.S.
    Lewis's ideas on human evolution and the Fall, one that would allow
    retention of Lewis's important theological insights without requiring one
    to slight evolution? My son is well aware of evolution, and is asking some
    very good questions, likely better than my answers will ever be, but I'm
    trying.

    Chuck Austerberry
    Creighton University
    Omaha, NE 68178
    cfauster@creighton.edu

    Charles (Chuck) F. Austerberry, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor of Biology
    Member, Prehealth Sciences Advisory Committee
    Creighton University
    2500 California Plaza
    Omaha, NE 68178
    Voice: (402)-280-2154 or -2321
    FAX: (402)-280-5595
    e-mail: cfauster@creighton.edu



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 21 2000 - 12:34:17 EST