Re: concordism/time

From: Adam Crowl (qraal@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 03:58:56 EST

  • Next message: glenn morton: "Re: concordism/time"

    Hi ASA

    Dick, I think you might've over-reacted. I don't think Jim's espousing
    Setterfield lunacy. Some research does indicate a higher velocity for c in
    the far, far past during the very hot and tiny phase of the Big Bang. By the
    time nucleii had formed it was down to its current value.

    Adam

    >From: Dick Fischer <dfischer@mnsinc.com>
    >To: asa@calvin.edu
    >Subject: Re: concordism/time
    >Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 21:57:31 -0500
    >
    >Jim Stark wrote:
    >
    > >However, evidence is gathering
    > >that it (the speed of light) may have been much faster in the past.
    >
    >Oh, really? Explain why the speed of light is identical when it comes from
    >deep space having traveled 10 billion light-years or so, or coming from own
    >sun with 8 minutes worth of transit time, or coming from your own light
    >bulb. All light, old or new, travels at the same speed. Also, name a
    >mechanism that would cause a slow down in the speed of light.
    >
    >Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
    >"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago."

    ______________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 12 2000 - 03:59:38 EST