Hi ASA
Dick, I think you might've over-reacted. I don't think Jim's espousing
Setterfield lunacy. Some research does indicate a higher velocity for c in
the far, far past during the very hot and tiny phase of the Big Bang. By the
time nucleii had formed it was down to its current value.
Adam
>From: Dick Fischer <dfischer@mnsinc.com>
>To: asa@calvin.edu
>Subject: Re: concordism/time
>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 21:57:31 -0500
>
>Jim Stark wrote:
>
> >However, evidence is gathering
> >that it (the speed of light) may have been much faster in the past.
>
>Oh, really? Explain why the speed of light is identical when it comes from
>deep space having traveled 10 billion light-years or so, or coming from own
>sun with 8 minutes worth of transit time, or coming from your own light
>bulb. All light, old or new, travels at the same speed. Also, name a
>mechanism that would cause a slow down in the speed of light.
>
>Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
>"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago."
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 12 2000 - 03:59:38 EST