At 12:58 AM 1/12/00 PST, Adam Crowl wrote:
>Hi ASA
>
>Dick, I think you might've over-reacted. I don't think Jim's espousing
>Setterfield lunacy. Some research does indicate a higher velocity for c in
>the far, far past during the very hot and tiny phase of the Big Bang. By the
>time nucleii had formed it was down to its current value.
Hi Adam
THis is not at all what Jim is referring to. You obviously don't know who
Lambert Dolphin is nor have you looked at his web page or you wouldn't say
this. Lambert is a big supporter of Setterfield's lunacy and has articles
by Setterfield on his web page.
articles include but are not limited to:
A Brief History of c
Implications of Changing Constants, by Lambert Dolphin. New information
added 3/8/99.
A Layman's Guide to the CDK Debate, by Malcolm Bowden
Reports of the Death of Speed of Light Decay are Premature, by Malcolm
Bowden (April 1998, CEN TJ article)
Atomic Behavior, Light and the Redshift, by Barry Setterfield - | PDF
version
Faster Than the Speed of Light (space travel and the speed of gravity)
What is Light?
While Setterfield has grabbed ahold of the idea that light traveled faster
in the wee parts of the Big Bang, they only use that as philosphical
support for the concept that c has changed.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 12 2000 - 06:28:34 EST