Re: The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything

From: Susan Cogan (Susan-Brassfield@ou.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 10:46:47 EST

  • Next message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger)"

    >In a message dated 05/12/00 15:58:22 GMT Standard Time, Bertvan@aol.com
    >writes:
    >
    >> With reason *this* far gone, it is no wonder that materialists,
    >> and the like are willing to forego it with respect to something as
    >> relatively unimportant as science, if doing so will appear to
    >> protect or promote their "purpose," their precious world-view
    >> that gives their lives (in their view) some sort of "feeling of ability to
    >> control the universe."

    AutismUK:
    >Well, I can only hope this is a parody. If so , 10 out of 10.

    It's a parody of something Chris Cogan wrote. It's one of her two
    ways of responding when she gets mad and can't think of an answer.
    The other one is a boilerplate post about how she has a right to her
    opinion.

    Susan 

    -- 
----------

      I am aware that the conclusions arrived at in this work will be 
denounced by some as highly irreligious; but he who denounces them is 
bound to shew why it is more irreligious to explain the origin of man 
as a distinct species by descent from some lower form, through the 
laws of variation and natural selection, than to explain the birth of 
the individual through the laws of ordinary reproduction.

    ---Charles Darwin

    http://www.telepath.com/susanb/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:20:22 EST