>>>
2) A majority of scientists believe that methodological naturalism is a
ground-rule for science, a strong line of demarcation. They believe
that any hypothesis about physical events or historical developments
which include the possibility of extra-natural causation must
_a_priori_ be rejected as unworthy of "scientific" consideration. I
think they are wrong about that philosophical point. I've discussed
this point in other posts, so I won't do that here.
<<<
This is two seperate problems - historical data and current physical
events.
A. There is no way to test historical data. We could have been seeded by
God and/or space aliens but
God and/or space aliens lost interest and left this galaxy there is no
pragmatic importance either way.
B. If God and/or space aliens are currently messing with us the effect
should be detectable, should it not?
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 05 2000 - 17:14:30 EDT