Re: Darkness spreads over Kansas

Jeff Schnitker (bms@bonwell.com)
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:07:31 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "RE: Empirical Evidence"
Previous message: Troy Britain: "RE: Empirical Evidence"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Darkness spreads over Kansas"
Next in thread: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Darkness spreads over Kansas"

> SJ: Both Evolution and Creation are models, not theories.
>
> Creation is perhaps a model but not a theory. Evolution is however a good
theory.

Would you accept the definition of "theory" as: a concept that is not yet
verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena?
If so Creation is a theory, if not what definition would make evolution a
good theory and creation not a theory at all?

Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "RE: Empirical Evidence"
Previous message: Troy Britain: "RE: Empirical Evidence"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Darkness spreads over Kansas"
Next in thread: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Darkness spreads over Kansas"