Re: A fine-tuned universe
Ed Brayton (cynic@net-link.net)
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:42:20 -0500Howard J. Van Till wrote:
>
> Given the current exchange of comments on the fine-tuned character of this
> universe, let me throw in a brief contribution.
>
> 1. There appears to be a strong case for saying that this universe is
> characterized by a long list of specific properties and dynamic
> capabilities that make it "just right" for the appearance of the type of
> carbon-based life that we see.
>
> 2. I personally take that as affirmative evidence that this universe was
> "designed," in the specific and modern sense of having been thoughtfully
> conceptualized by its Source of being for the accomplishment of some
> purpose. (As a Christian I might prefer to say that in a far more
> theologically meaningful way, but for now let's leave it in this minimalist
> form.)
>
> 3. This use of the universe's fine-tuned nature has an interesting feature
> that is sometimes overlooked by those who employ it. The fine-tuning
> feature here noted is a necessary trait of the universe only if the life
> forms at which we marvel are presumed to be the outcome of the universe's
> (robust and gapless) formational economy.
>
> 4. If, on the other hand, one presumes that the continuity of the
> universe's formational history has been broken by occasional episodes of
> form-imposing divine intervention, then there is no need for the
> fine-tuning. Any deviations from the fine-tuned character of this universe
> could simply be compensated for by additiional episodes of irruptive divine
> action. In fact, one might argue that the appearance of fine-tuning would
> then be misleading.
>
> 5. Therefore, as I see it, any apppeal to fine-tuning as evidence of
> "design" entails the acceptance of what I have called the "robust
> formational economy principle."
>
> 6. Proponents of "Intelligent Design" reject the robust formational economy
> principle.
>
> 7. Therefore, quite ironically, proponents of ID cannot make an appeal to
> fine-tuning as evidence favoring their vision of "intelligent design,"
> which includes, as an essential element, the necessity for occasional
> episodes of "extranatural assembly by a crafty molecular artisan."
Thanks, Howard. This mild-mannered deist couldn't have said it better
himself. <G>
Ed