"Remember what I said before: if creation is scientifically impossible,
then evolution must be true, no matter how improbable it is. Since
creation is scientifically impossible, evolution must be the truth."
I must have missed something Kevin.
1. Why is "creation scientifically impossible?"
2. If it is, how does "evolution must be true" follow?
I could understand it if you'd written "if creation is impossible, then
evolution must be true." Although even then I'd insert a qualifier that
suggests there might still be some other possibility we've not though of
yet.
What am I missing?
Burgy
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]