Joseph: 0.95 is not limited to correlational evidence. So, here is a chance to
make another cool $1000. You say that 0.95 is a standard limited to
correlational analyses and we both put up $1000. If you are right, you
collect the $2000. If I am right, I collect the $2000. Deal?
If you don't put your money where your mouth is Pim, you will look like
a liar to the whole world. And if you do, then "Poor Joseph" will be
rich. Which do you prefer O Great List Teacher?>
Poor Joseph, if he had evidence he should share it with us rather than try to muddle science with silly bets.
So explain how science can support a game of cards if the likelyhood of the individual hands is so small ?
Another strawman bites the dust.