RE: Petersen'sNewInsights;Morton,Rylander,van MeursReplies

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Sun, 30 Aug 1998 22:19:42 -0700

Joseph: << You are unanimous in the propriety of requiring the presentation of
credentials before giving one leave to speak. This was not mentioned in
the welcoming communication on protocol from Phillip Johnson. You need
to present your case and prevail upon him, if you can, to change his
protocol.>>

Dear Joseph, why this strawman argument. I did not say that one has to show one's credentials before one can speak. I said that it is quite appropriate for Glenn to ask about credentials when faced with a statement of 'unassailable'.

Joseph:
<< As the protocol presently stands, "Everyone should feel free to sound
off, but the discussion should at all times be courteous and nobody
should feel badgered or harassed." >>

Me thinks you protest too much.

I have not read the book so I am curious why does Petersen conclude that a 'supernatural' explanation is required ? What evidence of the existance and the science of this fourth dimension exists ?