> Glenn, John and Pim,
> You are unanimous in the propriety of requiring the presentation of
> credentials before giving one leave to speak. This was not mentioned in
> the welcoming communication on protocol from Phillip Johnson. You need
> to present your case and prevail upon him, if you can, to change his
> protocol.
Obviously you're welcome to speak here, as are those who disagree with you.
Don't mistake skepticism and logical criticism (which was pretty decisive in
this case, IMHO) with censorship.
That said, I look forward to lurking re the upcoming discussion of his book,
if there is one. It sounds like geologists' and physicists' comments would
be especially apt.
--John