>Question -- does it not appear that his whole argument is one "by analogy?"
>Or is there more to it than that?
To which Terry Gray responded:
>Yep, that's I how I read it.
Wrong. No one ever lost a copyright violation case on the grounds of an
analogy. Design inferences are not analogies.
Paul Nelson
(I'll be at the NTSE conference, and off-line until next week.)