>Now Ross may be wrong, but he is basing his view on scientific
>evidence, which Glenn no doubt knows about, but fails to mention.>>
Jim Bell replied
>
>I think this data is important re: Glenn's charges against Hugh. Thanks.
>
Come on guys. While I am flattered that you all think I know everything, am I
to be accused of dishonesty if anything escapes my notice, I forget something
or if I don't mention every article published anywhere? This seems a little
harsh to me.
I don't see why Stephen would make such a crack and you agree with it, Jim.
On numerous occasions I have retracted statements I made which were factually
wrong. This is an example of what is so wrong with the conservatives approach
to the creation evolution issue. They ascribe evil motives to the opponent.
Witness the names John Woodmorappe calls me such as "intentionally decietful"
in his book and lots of other things in his reply to my review at
http://earth.nettrek.net.au/~rik/cyber/refute.htm
Are you all saying I am "intentionally deceitful"?
glenn
Foundation,Fall and Flood
http://members.gnn.com/GRMorton/dmd.htm