Lloyd Eby wrote:
>More generally, why does anyone have to hold to supernaturalism, in the
>anti-naturalsm sense of that term, in order to have an accurate or
>adequate interpretation of Scripture or an accurate or adequate
>apprehension of divine will and action? If I understand you accurately,
>you seem to hold that this is necessary. But I'm not convinced that it is.
>
>BTW, you can't solve this problem by appealing to tradition. It's
>entirely possible that tradition is mistaken here.
You have exactly understood my complaint. And you exactly disagree with me.
And you recognize that tradition is on my side. May I take this as an
admission that a new doctrine has been formed?
Jim
Jim Blake
Associate Professor
Department of Electrical Engineering
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843