Re: [asa] PvM's View of What Science IS

Strike two, Pim van Meurs.
   
  If 'what science IS' is irrelevant, then you have NO business, and NO authority whatsoever to say what is or is not 'scientifically' vacuous. If it were in a court of law, your testimony would be struck from the record - as if you had never testified. You are on the verge of revealing your irrelevance if you cannot or will not answer.
   
  Last chance Pim. Do you really have NO view of what science IS? Your geology/oceanography degree seems to be hanging in the balance. What makes your views 'scientific'?
  
Respectfully awaiting a positive response,
   
  G.A.

PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com> wrote: Irrelevant my dear friend, totally irrelevant.

   
  On 9/15/07, Gregory Arago wrote:
> Strike one, Pim.

> If necessary, please re-read the OP and then actually address the question - no need to discuss intelligent design theories or divert, distract, wander away. The title of the thread makes the question rather obvious. If you won't or can't answer it or make a positive contribution to ASA's knowledge, then it appears Peter Loose's opinion of you is justified. Why not just share your perspective?

> What, in your view, IS science, Pim?

       
---------------------------------
All new Yahoo! Mail
---------------------------------
Get news delivered. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Sep 15 18:16:15 2007