Re: [asa] What Does ID Add?

In making an argument even more convoluted than usual I ended up with the meaning reversed. The last sentence of the paragraph below should read, "I did not mean that that position itself will not eventually have to be discarded - though I also think that that is the case.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: George Murphy
  To: Gregory Arago
  Cc: AmericanScientificAffiliation
  Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 5:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [asa] What Does ID Add?

  I think I have made it clear in my posts on this topic that I have been talking about the terminology of "theistic evolution" and "evolutionary creationism." (Note, e.g., my parenthetical remark below.) When I said "TE is not going to go away" it was quite clear that I meant that people are not going to stop using the phrase "theistic evolution" for a position which accepts the reality of biological macroevolution and holds that God is involved in that process. I did not mean that that position itself will eventually have to be discarded - though I also think that that is the case.
  .....................
  Shalom
  George
  http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Sep 9 17:40:55 2007