Re: [asa] YEC--What can we offer them?

From: James Mahaffy <Mahaffy@dordt.edu>
Date: Wed Jul 04 2007 - 17:32:04 EDT

-- 
James Mahaffy (mahaffy@dordt.edu)          Phone: 712 722-6279
498 4th Ave NE
Biology Department                                     FAX :  712 722-1198
Dordt College, Sioux Center IA 51250-1697
>>> On 7/3/2007 at 12:43 PM, in message
<20070703174520.64828711495@gray.dordt.edu>, "Randy Isaac"
<randyisaac@comcast.net> wrote:
[snip]
> 
> By the way, in my talk I ended up claiming that, as far as I could tell, 
> there has been no case where a scientific theory which has been validated by 
> 
> data from many independent sources and which is accepted as consensus by the 
> 
> mainstream community, has been later invalidated. I'd love to hear of any 
> examples that any of you might think of.
I haven't been following this thread closely but I think Kuhn just rolled over in his grave.
He would claim  that there was lot of evidence for pre Einstein physics and in fact some of those models still work.
In chemistry biologist still use the Bohr mode because it explains some concepts easier than drawing clouds of electrons etc.
The early models of the cell assuming the protein was denatured fit with a lot of the evidence.
Some of the early inheritance models (pre-Cell theory fit a lot of the evidence).
That does not mean that some of these were not poor or wrong models but they did fit with a lot of the evidence of the day.
[snip again]
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 4 17:33:23 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 04 2007 - 17:33:23 EDT