Re: Reading Genesis literally

From: Charles Carrigan <CCarriga@olivet.edu>
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 14:19:28 EDT

What exactly is a "conservative perspective" with regards to reading/interpreting scripture?
 
 
Curiously,
Charles
 
 
_______________________________
Charles W. Carrigan, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Geology
Olivet Nazarene Univ., Dept. of Physical Sciences
One University Ave.
Bourbonnais, IL 60914
PH: (815) 939-5346
FX: (815) 939-5071
ccarriga@olivet.edu
http://geology.olivet.edu/
 
"To a naturalist nothing is indifferent;
the humble moss that creeps upon the stone
is equally interesting as the lofty pine which so beautifully adorns the valley or the mountain:
but to a naturalist who is reading in the face of the rocks the annals of a former world,
the mossy covering which obstructs his view,
and renders indistinguishable the different species of stone,
is no less than a serious subject of regret."
          - James Hutton
_______________________________

>>> "David Opderbeck" <dopderbeck@gmail.com> 4/24/2006 11:20 AM >>>

Has anyone read John Collins' new book, "Gensis 1-4: A Linguistic, Literary, and Theological Commentary"? (Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0875526195/sr=8-1/qid=1145895399/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-5350462-9748866?%5Fencoding=UTF8 ) It's really outstanding, I think, in taking the text very, very seriously from a conservative perspective, and in showing by doing that that a simple "literalist" isn't what the text intends to communicate. Not everyone here will agree with all of Collins' conclusions, but it's well worth the read.

Received on Mon Apr 24 14:21:15 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 14:21:15 EDT