Re: Harvard's intellectual culture discourages identification with Christians...

On 4/24/06, RFaussette@aol.com <RFaussette@aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 4/23/2006 11:50:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> rich.blinne@gmail.com writes:
>
> Quite the contrary. What you said here effectively summarizes and
> contextualizes what you have been saying for years. As before, no comment on
> my part is necessary.
>
> OK. It's the contrary. I've been saying it for years. No comment is
> necessary. But WHAT have I been saying for years?
> Can you regurgitate it? You haven't done that yet and that's what I mean
> by not knowing the context. Your above few lines skirt all around "it."
> Effectively "summarize it and contextualize it" so it is apparent you know
> what it is and I can see what you are arguing.
>
> rich faussette
>

When a defense attorney sees the prosecutor has a profoundly weak case, he
immediately rests. BTW, in the twenty years of my online debates this is the
first time I recall doing this. You have made your case over and over and
over. The "jury" in this case are the readers of this forum. They also have
access to the archives and see whether this statement does fairly summarize
your views as I believe it does. I have no need to rebut you as you have
done so to yourself so beautifully. Why have I merely repeated your words
four times now? Because they are the best argument against you as they are
so obviously wrong. So, unless you want to say that you have twisted your
own words I will answer your question as follows:

But WHAT have I been saying for years?

You see sodom and gomorrah and the tower of babel but you can't make the
biblical connection. It's the old covenant at work. You are arguing a young
earth and ID and can't see that the God of the Hebrew bible is a god of
fertility and war.
Received on Mon Apr 24 10:05:39 2006