Indeed, if there ever was a question with an obvious answer...... Though it would be impossible to verify since few people report or track submissions.
But here's a related one with not so obvious an answer. Does anyone know of any report published anywhere that accurately articulates the arguments presented at the Nov. 5 2005 RATE conference? I'm still getting questions about how to respond to RATE. It's easy to reply with "well, they typically make the following claims..." but I'm not satisfied with that. I would prefer a clear written documentation of what they actually stated. Is there a "technical proceedings" of that conference? If so, I'd very much like to obtain a copy for reference.
Randy
----- Original Message -----
From: George Murphy
To: ASA list
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:23 AM
Subject: dumb question
How many papers on their work has the RATE group submitted to peer-reviewed journals in geophyics or other relevant scientific areas?
Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
Received on Sat Apr 15 13:37:04 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 15 2006 - 13:37:04 EDT