> Related to this was a story in the
> weekend NY Times
>
(http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/26/business/worldbusiness/26sulfur.html?th)
> about China's increasing use of high-sulfur oil which is cheaper than
sweet
> oil. Burning such fuels in automobiles with catalytic converters ruins the
> converters and growing atmospheric sulfur emissions are leading to sharp
> declines in urban air quality in China.
> It is hard to see any "magic bullets" on the horizon in considering the
energy
> equation.
I don't by any means think that there will always be technological solutions
to all our problems. But as a theorist I can ask naive questions about
technology, such as, "Isn't it possible to develop catalytic convertors that
can deal with high-sulfur fuels?"
Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
Received on Mon Jun 28 10:36:32 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 28 2004 - 10:36:33 EDT